COVID-19 Vaccine Information and Infertility Posts on X: Insights on a Misinformation Pandemic
- PMID: 38698715
- PMCID: PMC11232903
- DOI: 10.7812/TPP/23.142
COVID-19 Vaccine Information and Infertility Posts on X: Insights on a Misinformation Pandemic
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate misinformation surrounding infertility and the COVID-19 vaccine on X (formerly known as Twitter) by analyzing the prevalence and content of this misinformation across a sample of posts on X.
Methods: This study is a retrospective review of posts on X (formerly known as tweets) from the COVID-19-TweetIDs dataset from July 2021 and November 2021. Included posts were from crucial time points in the COVID-19 vaccine discourse and contained at least one word related to COVID-19 vaccination and fertility. Posts were analyzed and categorized based on factuality, common words, and hashtags. Descriptive statistics on total followers, account verification status, and engagement were obtained. Differences between posts on X classified as factual and misinformation were examined using analysis of variance or χ2 tests. Sentiment analysis determined if post content was generally positive, neutral, or negative.
Results: A total of 17,418 relevant posts on X were reviewed: 11,436 from timeframe 1 (July 2021) and 5982 from timeframe 2 (December 2021). Misinformation posts rose from 29.9% in July 2021 to 45.1% in November 2021. In both timeframes, accounts sharing factual information had more followers (p < 0.001), and verified users were more likely to share accurate posts (p ≤ 0.001). Factual and misinformation posts had similar engagement. Sentiment analysis identified that real posts were more positive and misinformation posts were more negative (p < 0.001).
Conclusions and relevance: Misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine and fertility is highly prevalent on X and threatens vaccine uptake in patients desiring future fertility. Accounts sharing factual information were likely to have more followers and be verified; therefore, verifying more physicians sharing accurate information is critical.
Keywords: COVID-19; Fertility; Misinformation; Pregnancy; Twitter; Vaccine Hesitancy.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of InterestNone declared
Figures


Similar articles
-
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Building a Public Twitter Data Set of Antivaccine Content, Vaccine Misinformation, and Conspiracies.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 17;7(11):e30642. doi: 10.2196/30642. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021. PMID: 34653016 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Confidence, and Public Engagement: A Global Social Listening Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 11;23(6):e27632. doi: 10.2196/27632. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34061757 Free PMC article.
-
Keeping you posted: analysis of fertility-related social media posts after introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2023 Jun;28(3):168-172. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2023.2189501. Epub 2023 Mar 30. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2023. PMID: 36995737
-
Social Media Misinformation about Pregnancy and COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review.Med Princ Pract. 2024;33(3):232-241. doi: 10.1159/000538346. Epub 2024 Mar 14. Med Princ Pract. 2024. PMID: 38484723 Free PMC article.
-
The search for the missing link between health misinformation & health disparities.Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Dec;129:108386. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108386. Epub 2024 Jul 31. Patient Educ Couns. 2024. PMID: 39236344 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical