Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 1:11:23333928241249521.
doi: 10.1177/23333928241249521. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Self-scheduling in a Large Multispecialty and Multisite Clinic: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Examination of Multiple Self-Scheduled Visit Types

Affiliations

Self-scheduling in a Large Multispecialty and Multisite Clinic: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Examination of Multiple Self-Scheduled Visit Types

Frederick North et al. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Background: Self-scheduling of medical visits is becoming available at many medical institutions. We aimed to examine the self-scheduled visit counts and rate of growth of self-scheduled visits in a multispecialty practice.

Methods: For 85 weeks extending from January 1, 2022 through August 24, 2023, we examined self-scheduled visit counts for over 1500 self-scheduled visit types. We compared completed self-scheduled visit counts to all scheduled completed visit counts for the same visit types. We collected counts of the most frequently self-scheduled visit types for each week and examined the change over time. We also determined the proportion that each visit type was self-scheduled.

Results: There were 20,769 699 completed visits during the course of the study that met the criteria for inclusion. Self-scheduled visits accounted for 4.0% of all completed visits (838 592/20,769 699). Over the 85-week span, self-scheduled visits rose from 3.0% to 5.3% of the total. There were 1887 unique visit types that were associated with completed visits. There were just 6 appointment visit types of the total 1887 self-scheduled visit types that accounted for 50.7% of the total 838 592 self-scheduled visits. Those 6 visit types were a lab blood test visit (19.5%, 163 K visits), two Family Medicine office visit types (13.0%, 109 K visits), a screening mammogram visit type (6.6%, 55 K visits), a scheduled express care visit type (6%, 50 K visits) and a COVID immunization visit type (5.7%, 48 K visits). Twenty-one visit types that were self-scheduled accounted for 75% of the total self-scheduled visits. Four seasonal visits, accounting for 10.6% of the total self-scheduled visits, were responsible for almost all the non-linear change in self-scheduling.

Conclusion: Self-scheduling accounted for a small but growing percent of all outpatient scheduled visits in a multispecialty, multisite practice. A wide range of visit types can be successfully self-scheduled.

Keywords: access to care; efficiency; family medicine; health economics; medical informatics; outpatient visits; practice management; self-schedule; specialty visits; visit scheduling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Scatterplots of weekly self-scheduled completed visit counts for 85 consecutive weeks. The two different markers represent the total self-scheduled weekly completed visit counts (blue, round) and the sum of self-scheduled visit counts from 4 seasonal visit types (3 self-schedulable immunization types and 1 self-schedulable respiratory testing), marked by red diamonds.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Scatter plot of total self-scheduled weekly completed visit counts minus the sum of the weekly counts of 4 seasonal visit types (3 self-schedulable immunization visit types and 1 self-schedulable respiratory testing visit type). The blue round markers on this graph are the graphic representation of Figure 1 blue round marker counts minus Figure 1 red diamond counts. Outlier 10 holiday weeks are omitted from the scatterplot figure. Red spikes on this graph are the 95% confidence intervals for the linear regression best fit. (b). Scatterplots show percent self-scheduled by week. Blue round markers represent the percentage of visits that were self-scheduled (100*count of all self-scheduled visits/ count of all scheduled visits). Red hollow squares are the percentage of all visits that were self-scheduled minus the 4 self-scheduled seasonal visit types (100*(count of all self-scheduled visits minus sum of counts of 4 seasonal self-scheduled visits)/ count of all scheduled visits). Green spikes are the 95% confidence intervals for the linear regression fit of the red hollow squares. Outlier 10 holiday weeks are omitted from the scatterplots.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Scatterplots of weekly self-scheduled completed visit counts for 85 consecutive weeks. Six self-schedulable appointment visit types are shown. Each visit type reached a highest weekly completed self-scheduled visit count of 1000 or greater during the 85 weeks.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Scatterplots of weekly self-scheduled completed visit counts for 85 consecutive weeks. Six self-schedulable appointment visit types are shown. Each visit type reached a highest weekly completed self-scheduled visit count of 250 or more but less than 1000.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Scatterplots of weekly self-scheduled completed visit counts for 85 consecutive weeks. Six self-schedulable appointment visit types are shown. Each visit type reached a highest weekly completed self-scheduled visit count greater than 95 but less than 250.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Scatterplots of weekly self-scheduled as percent of total scheduled. Subgraphs selected to show variability of percent over time.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Woodcock E, Sen A, Weiner J. Automated patient self-scheduling: Case study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022;29(9):1637-1641. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac087 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang X, Yu P, Yan J. Patients’ adoption of the e-appointment scheduling service; A case study in primary healthcare. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;204:176-181. DOI: doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-427-5-176 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gu L, Xiang L, Lipner SR. Analysis of availability of online dermatology appointments during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(2):517-520. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.10.069 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yanovsky RL, Das S. Patient-initiated online appointment scheduling: Pilot program at an urban academic dermatology practice. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(5):1479-1481. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.035 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ambinder EB, Wang A, Oluyemi E, et al. Self-scheduling of screening mammograms using an online patient portal: Initial 8-year experience at a multisite academic institution. J Am Coll Radiol. 2024;21(1):141-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.06.040 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources