Utilization of at-home tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among healthcare workers in Chicago
- PMID: 38698942
- PMCID: PMC11062791
- DOI: 10.1017/ash.2024.17
Utilization of at-home tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among healthcare workers in Chicago
Abstract
Objective: To describe utilization of at-home coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing among healthcare workers (HCW).
Design: Serial cross-sectional study.
Setting and participants: HCWs in the Chicago area.
Methods: Serial surveys were conducted from the Northwestern Medicine (NM HCW SARS-CoV-2) Serology Cohort Study. In April 2022, participants reflected on the past 30 days to complete an online survey regarding COVID-19 home testing. Surveys were repeated in June and November 2022. The percentage of completed home tests and ever-positive tests were reported. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to calculate prevalence rate ratios (PRR) and univariate analysis was used for association between participant characteristics with home testing and positivity.
Results: Overall, 2,226 (62.4%) of 3,569 responded to the survey in April. Home testing was reported by 26.6% of respondents and 5.9% reported having at least one positive home test. Testing was highest among those 30-39 years old (35.9%) and nurses (28.3%). A positive test was associated (P < .001) with exposure to people, other than patients with known or suspected COVID-19. Home testing increased in June to 36.4% (positivity 19.9%) and decreased to 25% (positivity 13.5%) by November.
Conclusion: Our cohort findings show the overall increase in both home testing and ever positivity from April to November - a period where changes in variants of concern of SARS-CoV-2 were reported nationwide. Having an exposure to people, other than patients with known or suspected COVID-19 was significantly associated with both, higher home testing frequency and ever-test positivity.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declare none.All authors on this manuscript declare no conflicts of interests or financial disclosures relevant to this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Serologic Status and SARS-CoV-2 Infection over 6 Months of Follow Up in Healthcare Workers in Chicago: A Cohort Study.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;43(9):1207-1215. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.367. Epub 2021 Aug 9. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 34369331 Free PMC article.
-
Quantification of Occupational and Community Risk Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Seropositivity Among Health Care Workers in a Large U.S. Health Care System.Ann Intern Med. 2021 May;174(5):649-654. doi: 10.7326/M20-7145. Epub 2021 Jan 29. Ann Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33513035 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of mRNA vaccines in curtailing SARS-CoV-2 infection and disability leave utilisation among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional analysis from a tertiary healthcare system in the Greater Houston metropolitan area.BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 12;11(10):e054332. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054332. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34642201 Free PMC article.
-
SARS-CoV-2 infections and attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines among healthcare workers in the New York Metropolitan area, USA.Fam Med Community Health. 2022 Jul;10(3):e001692. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2022-001692. Fam Med Community Health. 2022. PMID: 35896283 Free PMC article.
-
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33502003 Free PMC article.
References
-
- CDC. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/index.html. Published 2020. Accessed August 20, 2023.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous