Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 Apr 16:arXiv:2404.10807v1.

Guidelines for releasing a variant effect predictor

Affiliations

Guidelines for releasing a variant effect predictor

Benjamin J Livesey et al. ArXiv. .

Update in

  • Guidelines for releasing a variant effect predictor.
    Livesey BJ, Badonyi M, Dias M, Frazer J, Kumar S, Lindorff-Larsen K, McCandlish DM, Orenbuch R, Shearer CA, Muffley L, Foreman J, Glazer AM, Lehner B, Marks DS, Roth FP, Rubin AF, Starita LM, Marsh JA. Livesey BJ, et al. Genome Biol. 2025 Apr 15;26(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03572-z. Genome Biol. 2025. PMID: 40234898 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Computational methods for assessing the likely impacts of mutations, known as variant effect predictors (VEPs), are widely used in the assessment and interpretation of human genetic variation, as well as in other applications like protein engineering. Many different VEPs have been released to date, and there is tremendous variability in their underlying algorithms and outputs, and in the ways in which the methodologies and predictions are shared. This leads to considerable challenges for end users in knowing which VEPs to use and how to use them. Here, to address these issues, we provide guidelines and recommendations for the release of novel VEPs. Emphasising open-source availability, transparent methodologies, clear variant effect score interpretations, standardised scales, accessible predictions, and rigorous training data disclosure, we aim to improve the usability and interpretability of VEPs, and promote their integration into analysis and evaluation pipelines. We also provide a large, categorised list of currently available VEPs, aiming to facilitate the discovery and encourage the usage of novel methods within the scientific community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Overview of variant effect predictors, including common inputs and outputs, and guidelines for development and release.

References

    1. Niroula A, Vihinen M. Variation Interpretation Predictors: Principles, Types, Performance, and Choice. Human Mutation. 2016;37: 579–597. doi: 10.1002/humu.22987 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu Y, Yeung WSB, Chiu PCN, Cao D. Computational approaches for predicting variant impact: An overview from resources, principles to applications. Front Genet. 2022;13. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.981005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katsonis P, Wilhelm K, Williams A, Lichtarge O. Genome interpretation using in silico predictors of variant impact. Hum Genet. 2022;141: 1549–1577. doi: 10.1007/s00439-022-02457-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17: 405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wagih O, Galardini M, Busby BP, Memon D, Typas A, Beltrao P. A resource of variant effect predictions of single nucleotide variants in model organisms. Molecular Systems Biology. 2018;14: e8430. doi: 10.15252/msb.20188430 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources