Incomes to Outcomes: A Global Assessment of Disparities in Cleft and Craniofacial Treatment
- PMID: 38700320
- DOI: 10.1177/10556656241249821
Incomes to Outcomes: A Global Assessment of Disparities in Cleft and Craniofacial Treatment
Abstract
ObjectiveRecent investigations focused on health equity have enumerated widespread disparities in cleft and craniofacial care. This review introduces a structured framework to aggregate findings and direct future research.DesignSystematic review was performed to identify studies assessing health disparities based on race/ethnicity, payor type, income, geography, and education in cleft and craniofacial surgery in high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Case reports and systematic reviews were excluded. Meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effect models for disparities described in three or more studies.SettingN/APatientsPatients with cleft lip/palate, craniosynostosis, craniofacial syndromes, and craniofacial trauma.InterventionsN/AResultsOne hundred forty-seven articles were included (80% cleft, 20% craniofacial; 48% HIC-based). Studies in HICs predominantly described disparities (77%,) and in LMICs focused on reducing disparities (42%). Level II-IV evidence replicated delays in cleft repair, alveolar bone grafting, and cranial vault remodeling for non-White and publicly insured patients in HICs (Grades A-B). Grade B-D evidence from LMICs suggested efficacy of community-based speech therapy and remote patient navigation programs. Meta-analysis demonstrated that Black patients underwent craniosynostosis surgery 2.8 months later than White patients (P < .001) and were less likely to undergo minimally-invasive surgery (OR 0.36, P = .002).ConclusionsDelays in cleft and craniofacial surgical treatment are consistently identified with high-level evidence among non-White and publicly-insured families in HICs. Multiple tactics to facilitate patient access and adapt multi-disciplinary case in austere settings are reported from LMICs. Future efforts including those sharing tactics among HICs and LMICs hold promise to help mitigate barriers to care.
Keywords: cleft lip and palate; craniosynostosis; low and middle income country; systematic review.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials in Cleft and Craniofacial Surgery.J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Mar;29(2):293-301. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004100. J Craniofac Surg. 2018. PMID: 29084117
-
A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Methodologies Between Resource-Limited and Resource-Rich Countries: A Case of Rotavirus Vaccines.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Dec;14(6):659-672. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0265-y. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016. PMID: 27475634
-
A systematic review of early speech interventions for children with cleft palate.Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jan;57(1):226-245. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12683. Epub 2021 Nov 12. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022. PMID: 34767284
-
Management of Speech and Hearing in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries: Current Conditions, Problems, Future Directions.J Craniofac Surg. 2025 May 1;36(3):1063-1071. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010391. Epub 2024 Jul 30. J Craniofac Surg. 2025. PMID: 39078135 Review.
-
Infraorbital nerve block for postoperative pain following cleft lip repair in children.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):CD011131. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011131.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27074283 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Hospitalization Trends for Airway Infections and In-Hospital Complications in Cleft Lip and Palate.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2428077. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28077. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39264632 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical