Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer
- PMID: 38700535
- DOI: 10.1007/s00705-024-06033-3
Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer
Abstract
Objective: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) is a distinct molecular subtype of gastric cancer (GC). At present, the clinical characteristics and prognostic implications of EBV infection and the potential clinical benefits of immune checkpoint blockade in GC remain to be clarified. Hence, this study was designed to analyze the clinical and pathological characteristics of GC patients with varying EBV infection states and compare their overall survival (OS).
Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 1031 consecutive GC patients who underwent gastrectomy at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from February 2018 to November 2022. EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization (ISH) was used for EBV assessment, and immunohistochemical staining was used for evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and Ki67 expression. EBVaGC was defined as tumors with EBV positivity. In addition, EBV-negative GC (EBVnGC) patients were matched with EBVaGC patients based on seven clinicopathological parameters (age, gender, anatomic subsite, tumor size, Lauren classification, degree of differentiation, and tumor-node-metastasis [TNM] stage). The correlations of clinical features with HER2, PD-L1, and Ki67 expression were evaluated statistically. The survival of patients was assessed through medical records, telephone, or WeChat communication, and prognostic analysis was performed using the logrank test as well as univariable and multivariable regression analysis.
Results: Out of 1031 GC patients tested, 35 (3.4%) were diagnosed with EBVaGC. Notably, the EBVaGC group exhibited a distinct predominance of males and younger patients, significantly higher Ki67 and PD-L1 expression levels, and a lower prevalence of pericancerous nerve invasion than the EBVnGC group (P < 0.01). In the 35 EBVaGC cases, Ki67 expression was negatively correlated with age (P < 0.05), suggesting that a younger onset age was associated with higher Ki67 expression. In addition, PD-L1 expression was correlated with the degree of differentiation, T-stage, and clinical stage of the patient. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression was elevated in tumors with lower differentiation or at later stages (P < 0.05). Using univariate analysis, Ki67, PD-L1, and clinical stage were identified as significant factors influencing the overall survival (OS) of EBVaGC patients (P < 0.05). Moreover, multivariate survival analysis revealed that clinical stage and Ki67 expression were independent risk factors for the OS of the patients (P < 0.05), and the three-year OS rate of EBVaGC patients was 64.2%.
Conclusion: EBV-ISH is a practical and valuable method to identify EBVaGC. Owing to its unique etiological, pathological, and clinical characteristics, patients with EBVaGC might benefit from immune checkpoint blockade therapy.
Keywords: Epstein-Barr virus; Epstein-Barr virus–associated gastric cancer; Gastric cancer; Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; Ki67; Programmed death-ligand 1.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Expression and prognostic roles of PIK3CA, JAK2, PD-L1, and PD-L2 in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma.Hum Pathol. 2016 Jul;53:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 4. Hum Pathol. 2016. PMID: 26980034
-
Prognostic Perspectives of STING and PD-L1 Expression and Correlation with the Prognosis of Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancers.Gut Liver. 2022 Nov 15;16(6):875-891. doi: 10.5009/gnl210359. Epub 2022 May 25. Gut Liver. 2022. PMID: 35611665 Free PMC article.
-
Differential expression of HER2 and downstream proteins in prediction of advanced tumor phenotypes and overall survival of patients with Epstein-Barr virus-positive vs. negative gastric cancers.Pathol Res Pract. 2019 Nov;215(11):152675. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2019.152675. Epub 2019 Sep 27. Pathol Res Pract. 2019. PMID: 31594682
-
Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer: A distinct subtype.Cancer Lett. 2020 Dec 28;495:191-199. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.09.019. Epub 2020 Sep 23. Cancer Lett. 2020. PMID: 32979463 Review.
-
The importance of Epstein-Barr virus infection in the systemic treatment of patients with gastric cancer.Semin Oncol. 2020 Apr-Jun;47(2-3):127-137. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 May 6. Semin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32402473 Review.
Cited by
-
Viral oncogenesis in cancer: from mechanisms to therapeutics.Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025 May 12;10(1):151. doi: 10.1038/s41392-025-02197-9. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025. PMID: 40350456 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Unlocking the Potential: Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) in Gastric Cancer and Future Treatment Prospects, a Literature Review.Pathogens. 2024 Aug 28;13(9):728. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13090728. Pathogens. 2024. PMID: 39338919 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The role of MAPK pathway in gastric cancer: unveiling molecular crosstalk and therapeutic prospects.J Transl Med. 2024 Dec 24;22(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05998-8. J Transl Med. 2024. PMID: 39719645 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization (WHO). Global Health Estimates 2020: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000–2019. WHO (2020) Accessed December 11, 2020. who www.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-l...
-
- Costache S, Sajin M, Wedden S et al A consolidated working classification of gastric cancer for histopathologists (Review). Biomed Rep. 2023 July 19;19(3):58
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous