Complications After Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 38700543
- DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04096-w
Complications After Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Outcomes of immediate breast reconstructions can be influenced by postoperative radiotherapy. However, there is no clarity on the use of prepectoral or subpectoral breast reconstruction in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). We reviewed evidence on the complication rates of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction in women undergoing PMRT.
Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were scanned for studies comparing complication rates of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction with PMRT. All complications were pooled in a random-effect meta-analysis to obtain odds ratio (OR).
Results: Eight observational studies were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference in the risk of infections (OR: 1.22 95% CI 0.79, 1.88 I2=0%), implant loss (OR: 0.86 95% CI 0.50, 1.50 I2=14%), seroma (OR: 1.01 95% CI 0.43, 2.34 I2=50%), hematoma (OR: 0.44 95% CI 0.12, 1.71 I2=0%), wound dehiscence (OR: 0.95 95% CI 0.42, 2.17 I2=0%), and skin necrosis (OR: 0.61 95% CI 0.21, 1.75 I2=36%), contracture (OR: 0.46 95% CI 0.15, 1.48 I2=54%) and the need for revision surgeries (OR: 0.85 95% CI 0.45, 1.60 I2=15%) between the prepectoral and subpectoral groups.
Conclusions: Data from observational studies indicates that in appropriately selected patients there may not be any difference in the risk of early complications with prepectoral or subpectoral breast reconstruction with PMRT. Current evidence is limited by the small number of studies, short follow-up and selection bias. There is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing the two approaches to obtain robust evidence on long-term outcomes.
Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Keywords: Breast cancer; Breast implant; Infection; Mastectomy; Radiotherapy; Tissue expander.
© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethical Approval: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Informed Consent: None
Similar articles
-
Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1260-1273. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03296-0. Epub 2023 Mar 22. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 36947180
-
The Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on the Outcomes of Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Feb;47(1):81-91. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03026-y. Epub 2022 Jul 25. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 35879475 Free PMC article.
-
Prognosis of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy Flap Necrosis: Predictors of Failure and Salvage.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jun;49(11):3081-3091. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04695-1. Epub 2025 Jan 27. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025. PMID: 39870930
-
Implants versus autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 31;10(10):CD013821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013821.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39479986
-
Meta-Analysis of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of PMRT.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 May;48(10):1940-1948. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03430-y. Epub 2023 Jun 28. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 37380747
References
-
- Li JG, Zhao AX, Tan ZQ et al (2023) Effects of different targeted therapies associated with adjuvant chemotherapy on clinical remission, survival and safety in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 27:7768–7780. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202308_33431 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Agrawal A (2019) Oncoplastic breast surgery and radiotherapy-adverse aesthetic outcomes, proposed classification of aesthetic components, and causality attribution. Breast J 25:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13193 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zhang C, Hu G, Biskup E et al (2018) Depression induced by total mastectomy, breast conserving surgery and breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 42:2076–2085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4477-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Song Y, Sun S, Li D et al (2021) Long-term oncologic safety of immediate reconstructive surgery in patients with invasive breast cancer: a retrospective matched-cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 19:348. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02450-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Yoon AP, Qi J, Brown DL et al (2018) Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: results of a multicenter prospective study. Breast 37:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.009 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials