Cranial Repair in Children: Techniques, Materials, and Peculiar Issues
- PMID: 38700690
- DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-42398-7_14
Cranial Repair in Children: Techniques, Materials, and Peculiar Issues
Abstract
Cranial repair in children deserves particular attention since many issues are still controversial. Furthermore, literature data offer a confused picture of outcome of cranioplasty, in terms of results and complication rates, with studies showing inadequate follow-up and including populations that are not homogeneous by age of the patients, etiology, and size of the bone defect.Indeed, age has merged in the last years as a risk factor for resorption of autologous bone flap that is still the most frequent complication in cranial repair after decompressive craniectomy.Age-related factors play a role also when alloplastic materials are used. In fact, the implantation of alloplastic materials is limited by skull growth under 7 years of age and is contraindicated in the first years if life. Thus, the absence of an ideal material for cranioplasty is even more evident in children with a steady risk of complications through the entire life of the patient that is usually much longer than surgical follow-up.As a result, specific techniques should be adopted according to the age of the patient and etiology of the defect, aiming to repair the skull and respect its residual growth.Thus, autologous bone still represents the best option for cranial repair, though limitations exist. As an alternative, biomimetic materials should ideally warrant the possibility to overcome the limits of other inert alloplastic materials by favoring osteointegration or osteoinduction or both.On these grounds, this paper aims to offer a thorough overview of techniques, materials, and peculiar issues of cranial repair in children.
Keywords: Bone graft; Bone splitting; Cranioplasty; Decompressive craniectomy; Decompressive craniotomy; Exchange cranioplasty; Pediatric; Reconstructive material.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
Problems of reconstructive cranioplasty after traumatic brain injury in children.Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Oct;33(10):1759-1768. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3541-8. Epub 2017 Sep 6. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017. PMID: 29149388 Review.
-
Factors related to failure of autologous cranial reconstructions after decompressive craniectomy.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;47(9):1420-1425. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019. PMID: 31353299
-
Cryopreservation of Autologous Cranial Bone Flaps for Cranioplasty: A Large Sample Retrospective Study.World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e853-e859. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.112. Epub 2017 Nov 20. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 29107719
-
Management of decompressive craniectomy defects: modern military treatment strategies.J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Nov;23(7 Suppl 1):2042-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318258ba36. J Craniofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 23154344
-
Prevalence of Postoperative Complications of Autologous and Heterologous Cranioplasty in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Pediatr Neurosurg. 2022;57(4):238-244. doi: 10.1159/000524874. Epub 2022 May 4. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 35609519
Cited by
-
Stability of cranial defect size following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury in the pediatric population: A retrospective study.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07893-8. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40603500 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials