Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 3;57(1):7-37.
doi: 10.1080/08351813.2024.2305038. eCollection 2024.

Communication in Primary Healthcare: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Conversation-Analytic Research

Affiliations

Communication in Primary Healthcare: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Conversation-Analytic Research

Rebecca K Barnes et al. Res Lang Soc Interact. .

Abstract

We report the first state-of-the-art review of conversation-analytic (CA) research on communication in primary healthcare. We conducted a systematic search across multiple bibliographic databases and specialist sources and employed backward and forward citation tracking. We included 177 empirical studies spanning four decades of research and 16 different countries/health systems, with data in 17 languages. The majority of studies originated in United States and United Kingdom and focused on medical visits between physicians and adult patients. We generated three broad research themes in order to synthesize the study findings: managing agendas, managing participation, and managing authority. We characterize the state-of-the-art for each theme, illustrating the progression of the work and making comparisons across different languages and health systems, where possible. We consider practical applications of the findings, reflect on the state of current knowledge, and suggest some directions for future research. Data reported are in multiple languages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

    1. Antaki, C., & Chinn, D. (2019). Companions’ dilemma of intervention when they mediate between patients with intellectual disabilities and health staff. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(11), 2024–2030. 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arreskov, A. B., Lindell, J. F., & Davidsen, A. S. (2021). General practitioner responses to concerns in chronic care consultations for patients with a history of cancer. Journal of Health Psychology, 27(10), 2261–2275. 10.1177/13591053211025593 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnes, R. K. (2018). Preliminaries to treatment recommendations in UK primary care: A vehicle for shared decision making? Health Communication, 33(11), 1366–1376. 10.1080/10410236.2017.1350915 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnes, R. K., & Van der Scheer, I. Z. (2021). Conversation analysis: Questioning patients about prior self-treatment. In Gavin B. & Daniel H. (Eds.), Analysing health communication: Discourse approaches (pp. 19–48). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
    1. Barry, C. A., Bradley, C. P., Britten, N., Stevenson, F. A., & Barber, N. (2000). Patients’ unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: Qualitative study. BMJ, 320(7244), 1246–1250. 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1246 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources