European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow (SECEC) rotator cuff tear registry Delphi consensus
- PMID: 38707551
- PMCID: PMC11064705
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.01.015
European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow (SECEC) rotator cuff tear registry Delphi consensus
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to establish consensus statements via a Delphi process on the factors that should be included in a registry for those patients undergoing rotator cuff tear treatment.
Methods: A consensus process on the treatment of rotator cuff utilizing a modified Delphi technique was conducted. Fifty-seven surgeons completed these consensus statements and 9 surgeons declined. The participants were members of the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow committees representing 23 European countries. Thirteen questions were generated regarding the diagnosis and follow-up of rotator cuff tears were distributed, with 3 rounds of questionnaires and final voting occurring. Consensus was defined as achieving 80%-89% agreement, whereas strong consensus was defined as 90%-99% agreement, and unanimous consensus was defined by 100% agreement with a proposed statement.
Results: Of the 13 total questions and consensus statements on rotator cuff tears, 1 achieved unanimous consensus, 6 achieved strong consensus, 5 achieved consensus, and 1 did not achieve consensus. The statement that reached unanimous consensus was that the factors in the patient history that should be evaluated and recorded in the setting of suspected/known rotator cuff tear are age, gender, comorbidities, smoking, traumatic etiology, prior treatment including physical therapy/injections, pain, sleep disturbance, sports, occupation, workmen's compensation, hand dominance, and functional limitations. The statement that did not achieve consensus was related to the role of ultrasound in the initial diagnosis of patients with rotator cuff tears.
Conclusion: Nearly all questions reached consensus among 57 European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow members representing 23 different European countries. We encourage surgeons to use this minimum set of variables to establish rotator cuff registries and multicenter studies. By adapting and using compatible variables, data can more easily be compared and eventually merged across countries.
Keywords: Consensus; Delphi; Diagnosis; Follow-up; Registry; Rotator cuff; Treatment.
© 2024 The Authors.
Similar articles
-
Consensus statement on the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: a Delphi approach by the Neer Circle of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Sep;30(9):1977-1989. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 Jun 9. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021. PMID: 34116192
-
Defining pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis: a consensus study.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Oct;33(10):2111-2117. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.04.018. Epub 2024 Jun 12. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024. PMID: 38871046
-
What are the predictors of response to physiotherapy in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears? Gaining expert consensus using an international e-Delphi study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 12;25(1):807. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07872-6. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 39395963 Free PMC article.
-
High degree of consensus on diagnosis and management of rotator cuff tears: a Delphi approach.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Oct;31(10):4594-4600. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07501-0. Epub 2023 Jul 31. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023. PMID: 37522951 Review.
-
Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 20;16:56. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0165-8. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016. PMID: 27206853 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Colasanti C.A., Fried J.W., Hurley E.T., Anil U., Matache B.A., Gonzalez-Lomas G., et al. Transosseous-equivalent/suture bridge arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in combination with late postoperative mobilization yield optimal outcomes and retear rate: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2022;38:148–158.e146. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.050. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources