Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;54(5):802-813.
doi: 10.1111/sltb.13092. Epub 2024 May 6.

Suicidal ambivalence: A scoping review

Tobias Teismann  1 , Annika Maria Siebert  1 , Thomas Forkmann  2
Affiliations

Suicidal ambivalence: A scoping review

Tobias Teismann et al. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Suicidal ambivalence is considered a characteristic condition of suicidal individuals. At the same time, there is a lack of a uniform definition, conception and assessment of suicidal ambivalence. On this background, the current scoping review aims to explore the extent, range, and nature of research activity on suicidal ambivalence and to summarize research findings.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in four different databases (PubMed, Psychinfo, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) using an array of search terms (e.g., ambivalence, internal suicide debate, reasons for living and reasons for dying, wish to live and wish to die).

Results: In total, 28 articles published between 1977 and 2023 were included in the scoping review. The study situation lacks a clear definition, conceptualization and operationalization of suicidal ambivalence. Nonetheless, suicidal ambivalence is a common experience in persons contemplating suicide and suicidal ambivalence seems to be present before, during and after a suicide attempt. Suicidal ambivalence is associated with diverse markers of negative/positive mental health as well as suicidal ideation and behavior.

Conclusion: Results point to the relevance of suicidal ambivalence. At the same time, there are large gaps in knowledge about the development, impact and therapeutic responsiveness of suicidal ambivalence.

Keywords: internal struggle; internal suicide debate; motivational interviewing; suicidal ambivalence; suicide.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ammermann, B. A., Fahlgren, M. K., Sorgi, K. M., & McCloskely, M. S. (2020). Differences in suicidal thoughts and behaviors among three racial groups. Crisis, 41, 172–178.
    1. Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
    1. Beale, E. E., Overholser, J., Gomez, S., Brannam, S., & Stockmeier, C. A. (2022). The path not taken: Distinguishing individuals who die by suicide from those who die by natural causes despite a shared history of suicide attempt. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 78(4), 526–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23231
    1. Beck, A. T., Brown, G. K., & Steer, R. A. (1997). Psychometric characteristics of the scale for suicide ideation with psychiatric outpatients. Behavior Research and Therapy, 35, 1039–1046.
    1. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Ranieri, W. F. (1988). Scale for suicide ideation: Psychometric properties of a self‐report version. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 499–505.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources