Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 6;19(5):e0296459.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296459. eCollection 2024.

External validation of a multi-biomarker-based score for predicting risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Affiliations

External validation of a multi-biomarker-based score for predicting risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Eric H Sasso et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: A multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA)-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score was developed and internally validated in a Medicare cohort to predict 3-year risk for myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or CVD death in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It combines the MBDA score, leptin, MMP-3, TNF-R1, age and four clinical variables. We are now externally validating it in a younger RA cohort.

Methods: Claims data from a private aggregator were linked to MBDA test data to create a cohort of RA patients ≥18 years old. A univariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was fit using the MBDA-based CVD risk score as sole predictor of time-to-a-CVD event (hospitalized MI or stroke). Hazard ratio (HR) estimate was determined for all patients and for clinically relevant subgroups. A multivariable Cox model evaluated whether the MBDA-based CVD risk score adds predictive information to clinical data.

Results: 49,028 RA patients (340 CVD events) were studied. Mean age was 52.3 years; 18.3% were male. HR for predicting 3-year risk of a CVD event by the MBDA-based CVD risk score in the full cohort was 3.99 (95% CI: 3.51-4.49, p = 5.0×10-95). HR were also significant for subgroups based on age, comorbidities, disease activity, and drug use. In a multivariable model, the MBDA-based CVD risk score added significant information to hypertension, diabetes, tobacco use, history of CVD, age, sex and CRP (HR = 2.27, p = 1.7×10-7).

Conclusion: The MBDA-based CVD risk score has been externally validated in an RA cohort that is younger than and independent of the Medicare cohort that was used for development and internal validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: ES, BM, DDFII, EH, CLC, RB-S, AG, and JSL are or were employed by Myriad Genetics during the conduct of the study and received salaries and may have received stock grants/options as compensation. EH has been employed by Labcorp. JC received grants or contracts from Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Corevitas, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Myriad, Pfizer, Sanofi, Setpoint, Scipher, and UCB and received consulting fees from Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Corevitas, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Myriad, Pfizer, Sanofi, Setpoint, Scipher, and UCB. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Validation of MBDA-based CVD risk score for predicting CVD risk in subgroups.
Results show hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Subgroupings are based on information from baseline period, except Biologic initiation or change, which is based on treatment changes during follow-up. Vertical lines indicate HRs of 1.0 (solid line) and 3.99 (dashed line). All HRs are statistically significantly >1.0, except for the <40-year-old subgroup. Comparisons between complementary subgroups all have p >0.05 except for Hypertension (p = 0.046), Sex (p = 0.046), Baseline drug use (p = 0.012) and Age (p = 0.005), which are each non-significant after Bonferroni correction for 13 comparisons (i.e., p >0.0038 [0.05/13]). For baseline RA drugs, the Methotrexate (MTX) category includes combinations with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs); the non-MTX csDMARD category excludes combinations with MTX, and the non-TNF inhibitor (TNFi) monotherapy (mono); and combination therapy (combo) categories include Janus kinase inhibitors.

References

    1. DeMizio DJ, Geraldino-Pardilla LB. Autoimmunity and Inflammation Link to Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2020;7[1]:19–33. doi: 10.1007/s40744-019-00189-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aviña-Zubieta JA, Choi HK, Sadatsafavi M, Etminan M, Esdaile JM, Lacaille D. Risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59[12]:1690–7. doi: 10.1002/art.24092 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agca R, Heslinga SC, Rollefstad S, Heslinga M, McInnes IB, Peters MJ, et al.. EULAR recommendations for cardiovascular disease risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of inflammatory joint disorders: 2015/2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76[1]:17–28. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209775 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alemao E, Cawston H, Bourhis F, Al M, Rutten-van Molken M, Liao KP, et al.. Comparison of cardiovascular risk algorithms in patients with vs without rheumatoid arthritis and the role of C-reactive protein in predicting cardiovascular outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56[5]:777–86. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew440 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arts EE, Popa C, Den Broeder AA, Semb AG, Toms T, Kitas GD, et al.. Performance of four current risk algorithms in predicting cardiovascular events in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74[4]:668–74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204024 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types