Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Dec;47(10):502197.
doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502197. Epub 2024 May 6.

Efficacy and safety of biological treatment for inflammatory bowel disease in elderly patients: Results from a GETECCU cohort

[Article in English, Spanish]
Cristina Suárez Ferrer  1 Francisco Mesonero Gismero  2 Berta Caballol  3 Maria Pilar Ballester  4 Iria Bastón Rey  5 Andrés Castaño García  6 Jose Miranda Bautista  7 Rosa Saiz Chumillas  8 Jose Manuel Benitez  9 Laura Sanchez-Delgado  10 Alicia López-García  11 Cristina Rubin de Celix  12 Inmaculada Alonso Abreu  13 Luigi Melcarne  14 Rocío Plaza Santos  15 Miquel Marques-Camí  16 Antonio Caballero Mateos  17 César Gómez Díez  18 Margalida Calafat  19 Horacio Alonso Galan  20 Pablo Vega Vilaamil  21 Beatriz Castro Senosiain  22 Andrea Guerro Moya  23 Carmen Yolanda Rodriguez Diaz  24 Katerina Spicakova  25 Noemi Manceñido Marcos  26 Gema Molina  27 Luisa de Castro Parga  28 Andres Rodriguez Angulo  29 Lidia Cuevas Del Campo  30 Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez Grau  31 Fernando Ramirez  32 Barbara Gomez Pastrana  33 Irene Gonzalez Partida  34 Belen Botella Mateu  35 Elena Peña Gonzalez  36 Eduardo Iyo  37 Alfonso Elosua Gonzalez  38 Empar Sainz Arnau  39 Luis Hernandez Villalba  40 Pablo Perez Galindo  41 Leyanira Torrealba Medina  42 Sara Monsalve Alonso  43 Jose Antonio Olmos Perez  44 Carmen Dueñas Sadornil  45 Laura Garcia Ramirez  46 María Dolores Martín-Arranz  46 Antonio López Sanroman  2 Agnès Fernández  3 Victor Merino Murgui  4 Cristina Calviño Suárez  5 Pablo Flórez-Diez  6 María Elena Lobato Matilla  7 Beatriz Sicilia  8 Pilar Soto Escribano  9 Carlos Maroto Martin  10 Míriam Mañosa  19 Manuel Barreiro-De Acosta  5 On belhaf of Young group of GETECCU
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Efficacy and safety of biological treatment for inflammatory bowel disease in elderly patients: Results from a GETECCU cohort

[Article in English, Spanish]
Cristina Suárez Ferrer et al. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Biological therapies used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have shown to be effective and safe, although these results were obtained from studies involving mostly a young population, who are generally included in clinical trials. The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the different biological treatments in the elderly population.

Methods: Multicenter study was carried out in the GETECCU group. Patients diagnosed with IBD and aged over 65 years at the time of initiating biological therapy (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, ustekinumab or vedolizumab) were retrospectively included. Among the patients included, clinical response was assessed after drug induction (12 weeks of treatment) and at 52 weeks. Patients' colonoscopy data in week 52 were assessment, where available. Regarding complications, development of oncological events during follow-up and infectious processes occurring during biological treatment were collected (excluding bowel infection by cytomegalovirus).

Results: A total of 1090 patients were included. After induction, at approximately 12-14 weeks of treatment, 419 patients (39.6%) were in clinical remission, 502 patients (47.4%) had responded without remission and 137 patients (12.9%) had no response. At 52 weeks of treatment 442 patients (57.1%) had achieved clinical remission, 249 patients had responded without remission (32.2%) and 53 patients had no response to the treatment (6.8%). Before 52 weeks, 129 patients (14.8%) had discontinued treatment due to inefficacy, this being significantly higher (p<0.0001) for Golimumab - 9 patients (37.5%) - compared to the other biological treatments analyzed. With respect to tumor development, an oncological event was observed in 74 patients (6.9%): 30 patients (8%) on infliximab, 23 (7.14%) on adalimumab, 3 (11.1%) on golimumab, 10 (6.4%) on ustekinumab, and 8 (3.8%) on vedolizumab. The incidence was significantly lower (p=0.04) for the vedolizumab group compared to other treatments. As regards infections, these occurred in 160 patients during treatment (14.9%), with no differences between the different biologicals used (p=0.61): 61 patients (19.4%) on infliximab, 39 (12.5%) on adalimumab, 5 (17.8%) on golimumab, 22 (14.1%) on ustekinumab, and 34 (16.5%) on vedolizumab.

Conclusions: Biological drug therapies have response rates in elderly patients similar to those described in the general population, Golimumab was the drug that was discontinued most frequently due to inefficacy. In our experience, tumor development was more frequent in patients who used anti-TNF therapies compared to other targets, although its incidence was generally low and that this is in line with younger patients based on previous literature.

Keywords: Biological treatment; Elderly patients; Enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal; GETECCU; Inflammatory bowel disease; Pacientes de edad avanzada; Tratamiento biológico.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources