Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 6;24(1):1242.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18738-w.

The Ergonomic Behaviors Evaluation Tool (EBET) based on social cognitive theory for the assembly line workers: development and psychometric assessment

Zakieh Sadat Hosseini  1 , Sedigheh Sadat Tavafian  2 , Omran Ahmadi  3 , Reza Maghbouli  4
Affiliations

The Ergonomic Behaviors Evaluation Tool (EBET) based on social cognitive theory for the assembly line workers: development and psychometric assessment

Zakieh Sadat Hosseini et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Ergonomic behaviors play a crucial role in preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). To measure these behaviors, this research aimed to develop and evaluate an ergonomic behaviors tool (EBET) based on the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) among women workers on assembly lines (WwAL).

Methods: The study was conducted from December 2022 to January 2023 with a focus on the psychometric assessment of EBET. Initially, a literature review and interviews were carried out to identify crucial concepts and primary items. The questionnaire's validity was evaluated using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and the Content Validity Index (CVI). To determine the domains of the tool, construct validity was examined by administering the items to 270 eligible women. The reliability of the tool was assessed using McDonald's Omega coefficient.

Results: From a total of 67 primary items, 50 were confirmed. The study demonstrated good validity with CVR = 0.92 and CVI = 0.97, along with reliable results indicated by McDonald's Omega coefficient of 0.74. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed ten distinct dimensions: outcome expectations, outcome expectancies, normative beliefs, perceived barriers, social support, observational learning, reinforcement, behavioral skills, self-efficacy, and intention. Together, these dimensions accounted for 66.25% of the variance in the data. Additionally, the confirmatory factor analysis results supported the presence of these ten constructs and demonstrated a satisfactory fit.

Conclusions: EBET is a dependable and valid instrument for evaluating the ergonomic behaviors of workers, utilizing the principles of SCT. Researchers can employ EBET to gather data and implement suitable training interventions to enhance ergonomic behavior among WwAL. However, it is crucial to recognize that EBET may not encompass all facets of ergonomic behaviors. Therefore, it is imperative for future research to prioritize the evaluation of EBET's suitability among diverse worker populations and to consider additional dimensions of ergonomics to ensure its wider applicability and effectiveness.

Keywords: Assembly line workers; Ergonomic behaviors; Psychometrics; Social cognitive theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An overview of the procedures involved in designing and evaluating the psychometric properties of EBET
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scree plot of the exploratory factor analysis of EBET
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Confirmatory factor analysis model of EBET questionnaire
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lotfollahzadeh A, Arefi MF, Gurjan HE, Razagari N, Ebadi B, Babaei-pouya A. musculoskeletal disorders among healthcare network staff using rapid office strain assessment (2019) Int J Musculoskelet Pain Prev. 2019;4:270–276. doi: 10.52547/ijmpp.4.4.270. - DOI
    1. Sanaeinasab H, Saffari M, Valipour F, Alipour HR, Sepandi M, Al Zaben F, et al. The effectiveness of a model-based health education intervention to improve ergonomic posture in office computer workers: a randomized controlled trial. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018;91:951–962. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1336-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Putsa B, Jalayondeja W, Mekhora K, Bhuanantanondh P, Jalayondeja C. Factors associated with reduced risk of musculoskeletal disorders among office workers: a cross-sectional study 2017 to 2020. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13940-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bao S, Howard N, Lin J-H. Are work-related musculoskeletal disorders claims related to risk factors in workplaces of the manufacturing industry? Ann Work Expo Heal. 2020;64:152–164. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxz084. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Das D, Kumar A, Sharma M. A systematic review of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among handicraft workers. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020;26:55–70. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1458487. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types