Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;60(1):3812-3820.
doi: 10.1111/ejn.16381. Epub 2024 May 6.

Carrier-frequency specific omission-related neural activity in ordered sound sequences is independent of omission-predictability

Anne Hauswald  1   2 , Kaja Rosa Benz  1   2 , Thomas Hartmann  1   2 , Gianpaolo Demarchi  1   2 , Nathan Weisz  1   2   3
Affiliations

Carrier-frequency specific omission-related neural activity in ordered sound sequences is independent of omission-predictability

Anne Hauswald et al. Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Regularities in our surroundings lead to predictions about upcoming events. Previous research has shown that omitted sounds during otherwise regular tone sequences elicit frequency-specific neural activity related to the upcoming but omitted tone. We tested whether this neural response is depending on the unpredictability of the omission. Therefore, we recorded magnetencephalography (MEG) data while participants listened to ordered or random tone sequences with omissions occurring either ordered or randomly. Using multivariate pattern analysis shows that the frequency-specific neural pattern during omission within ordered tone sequences occurs independent of the regularity of the omissions. These results suggest that the auditory predictions based on sensory experiences are not immediately updated by violations of those expectations.

Keywords: MEG; MVPA; Markov tone sequences; decoding; prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Barascud, N., Pearce, M. T., Griffiths, T. D., Friston, K. J., & Chait, M. (2016). Brain responses in humans reveal ideal observer‐like sensitivity to complex acoustic patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, E616–E625. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508523113
    1. Bekinschtein, T. A., Dehaene, S., Rohaut, B., Tadel, F., Cohen, L., & Naccache, L. (2009). Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 1672–1677. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809667106
    1. Bendixen, A., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2009). I heard that coming: Event‐related potential evidence for stimulus‐driven prediction in the auditory system. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8447–8451. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1493-09.2009
    1. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357
    1. Busse, L., & Woldorff, M. G. (2003). The ERP omitted stimulus response to “no‐stim” events and its implications for fast‐rate event‐related fMRI designs. NeuroImage, 18, 856–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00012-0

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources