Gradients in low birthweight by maternal education: A comparative perspective
- PMID: 38711567
- PMCID: PMC11070621
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101674
Gradients in low birthweight by maternal education: A comparative perspective
Abstract
Background: Longstanding research has shown strong inequalities in low birthweight by household income. However, most such research has focused on Anglophone countries, while evidence emerging from other developed countries suggest a stronger role of education rather than incomes in creating inequalities at birth. This paper compares gradients in low birthweight by maternal education, as well as explores underlying mechanisms contributing to these gradients, in France, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
Methods: Analyses are based on harmonized data from large, nationally-representative samples from France, UK and US. We use regression models and decomposition methods to explore the relative role of several possible mechanisms in producing birthweight inequalities.
Results: Inequalities in low birth weight across maternal education groups were relatively similar in the United States, the United Kingdom and France. However, the individual-level mechanisms producing such inequalities varied substantially across the three countries, with income being most important in the US, pregnancy smoking being most evident in France, and the UK occupying an intermediate position. Differences in the mechanisms producing birth health inequalities mirror differences in the policy environment in the three countries.
Conclusion: While inequalities in health appear from the earliest moments in many countries, our results suggest research on birth health inequalities, and therefore policies, is not easily generalizable across national contexts, and call for more scholarship in uncovering the "whys" of health inequalities in a variety of contexts.
Keywords: Birth outcomes; Comparative research; Determinants of health inequalities; Health inequalities.
© 2024 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
-
- Avendano M., Kawachi I. Invited commentary: The search for explanations of the American health disadvantage relative to the English. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2011;173(8):866–869. - PubMed
-
- Bartley M. John Wiley & Sons; 2016. Health inequality: An introduction to concepts, theories and methods.
-
- Bethel J., Green J., Kalton G., Nord C. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; Washington, DC: 2005. Early childhood longitudinal study, birth cohort (ECLS-B), sampling. Vol2 of the ECLS-B methodology report for the 9-month data collection, 2001.02 (NCES 2005.147)
-
- Bilgin A., Mendonca M., Wolke D. Preterm birth/low birth weight and markers reflective of wealth in adulthood: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2018;142(1) - PubMed
-
- Blinder A.S. Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources. 1973;8:436–455.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous