Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec;21(1):2343362.
doi: 10.1080/1547691X.2024.2343362. Epub 2024 May 7.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances alter innate immune function: evidence and data gaps

Affiliations
Review

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances alter innate immune function: evidence and data gaps

Drake W Phelps et al. J Immunotoxicol. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a large class of compounds used in a variety of processes and consumer products. Their unique chemical properties make them ubiquitous and persistent environmental contaminants while also making them economically viable and socially convenient. To date, several reviews have been published to synthesize information regarding the immunotoxic effects of PFASs on the adaptive immune system. However, these reviews often do not include data on the impact of these compounds on innate immunity. Here, current literature is reviewed to identify and incorporate data regarding the effects of PFASs on innate immunity in humans, experimental models, and wildlife. Known mechanisms by which PFASs modulate innate immune function are also reviewed, including disruption of cell signaling, metabolism, and tissue-level effects. For PFASs where innate immune data are available, results are equivocal, raising additional questions about common mechanisms or pathways of toxicity, but highlighting that the innate immune system within several species can be perturbed by exposure to PFASs. Recommendations are provided for future research to inform hazard identification, risk assessment, and risk management practices for PFASs to protect the immune systems of exposed organisms as well as environmental health.

Keywords: PFAS; Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances; ecotoxicology; immunotoxicology; innate immunity; zebrafish.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interest

DWP was paid consulting fees by the Center for Environmental Health (Oakland, CA), for consulting regarding a petition for testing of certain PFASs (May 2019-August 2022) as well as to provide toxicological expertise regarding the PFASs detected in fluorinated high-density polyethylene (March-May 2023). DWP was also paid to provide literature support to JCD for a PFAS expert witness report (May 2023). JCD serves/has served as a plaintiff’s expert witness for several cases involving PFAS manufacturers. All other authors declare no competing interests relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Chemical structures of PFASs discussed in this review.
Structures were made using ChemDraw Professional (v16.0.1.4) and standard International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) nomenclature. Structures are organized according to a previously described scheme (Wang et al. 2017).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Visual summary of mechanisms of PFAS toxicity observed in monocytes, microglia, and macrophages.
PFASs have been shown to disrupt immune signaling and other pathways in (A) monocytes (Corsini et al. 2011, 2012, 2021; Racchi et al. 2017; Masi et al. 2022), (B) microglia (Yang et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2015; Zhu et al. 2015; Ge et al. 2016; Lin et al. 2022), and (C) macrophages (Chang et al. 2005; Miyano et al. 2012; Kong et al. 2019; Wang [L] et al. 2021; Tian et al. 2021; Yu et al. 2022; Lee et al. 2022; Wang [D] et al. 2023). Black arrows and red lines with a “T” end indicate normal function (activating and inhibiting, respectively). PFAS-induced endpoints for each gene/protein are shown graphically as red up arrows (increase in signal and/or expression), blue down arrows (decrease in signal/expression), dash (no observed change), checkmark (binding between protein and any PFAS observed in vitro), checkmark with question mark (binding between protein and any PFAS suggested in silico, but not demonstrated in vitro). Details are provided in Supplementary Table 1. Abbreviations: AIM2: absent in melanoma 2; Arg-1: Arginase 1; ASC: Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD; BAK: Bcl-2 homologous antagonist killer; BAX: Bcl-2-associated X protein; BCL-2: B-cell lymphoma 2; BIP: Binding immunoglobulin protein; Casp1: Caspase 1; Casp3: Caspase 3; CCL2: Chemokine ligand 2, also called MCP-1; CXCL1: Chemokine (CXC motif) ligand 1; CD: Cluster of Differentiation (multiple types); COX2: Cytochrome c oxidase II; Cyt C: Cytochrome C; ERK: Extracellular signal-regulated kinase; H2-Aa: Histocompatibility 2, Class II antigen A, alpha; H2-K1: histocompatibility 2, K1, K region; IFNγ: Interferon-γ; IκB: nuclear factor of κ-light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor; IL: Interleukin (several types); iNOS: Inducible nitric oxide synthase; JNK: c-Jun N-terminal kinase; KO: knockout; LPS: Lipopoly-saccharide; MAPK: Mitogen-activated protein kinase; MMP9: Matrix metallopeptidase- 9; mtDNA: Mitochondrial DNA; NF-κB: Nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B- cells; NLRP3: NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3; OPN: Osteopontin; PARP: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase; PGE-2: Prostaglandin E2; PI3K: Phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PKCβ: Protein kinase Cβ; PPARα: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α; RACK1: Receptor for activated C kinase 1; RCS: Reactive carbonyl species; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; STAT3: Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3; TNFα: Tumor necrosis factor-α.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Visual summary of mechanisms suggested in tissue-level, acellular, and other studies not specifically in innate immune cells.
PFAS have been shown to disrupt (A) Toll-like receptor signaling (Singh et al. 2012; Zhang [H] et al. 2014, 2021; Sheng et al. 2017; Chen et al. 2018; Han et al. 2018b; Castaño-Ortiz et al. 2019; Guo et al. 2019; Shane et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2020; Zhong et al. 2020; Xie et al. 2021; Huang et al. 2022; Wan et al. 2022; Xu [L] et al. 2022; Liu et al. 2023, Tang et al. 2023) and (B) PPAR signaling (Corsini et al. 2012; Pennings et al. 2016; Sheng et al. 2017; Wu et al. 2017; Rodríguez-Jorquera et al. 2019; Shane et al. 2020; Christofides et al. 2021; Khazaee et al. 2021; Weatherly et al. 2021; Zhang [Q] et al. 2021; Camdzic et al. 2022, Chen et al. 2022; Evans et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2022; Xu [B] et al. 2022; Sun et al. 2023), but the effect of PFAS on these pathways in innate immune cells remained understudied. Black arrows and red lines with a “T” end indicate normal function (activating and inhibiting, respectively). PFAS-induced endpoints for each gene/protein are shown graphically as red up arrows (increase in signal/expression), blue down arrows (decrease in signal/expression), checkmark (binding between protein and any PFAS observed in vitro), checkmark with question mark (binding between protein and any PFAS suggested in silico, but not demonstrated in vitro). Details are provided in Supplementary Table 1. Abbreviations: CD36: Cluster of differentiation 36; E-FABP: Fatty acid binding protein [Epidermal type]; HMGB1: High mobility group box 1 protein; IκB: Nuclear factor of κ-light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor; IRAK: IL-1 receptor-associated kinase; MyD88: Myeloid differentiation primary response 88; NF-κB: Nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells; PPAR: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; TLR: Toll-like Receptor; TRAF6: TNF receptor associated factor-6.

References

    1. Abraham K, Mielke H, Fromme H, Völkel W, Menzel J, Peiser M, Zepp F, Willich S, Weikert C. 2020. Internal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and biological markers in 101 healthy 1-year-old children: Associations between levels of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and vaccine response. Arch Toxicol. 94:2131–2147. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aggad D, Mazel M, Boudinot P, Mogensen K, Hamming O, Hartmann R, Kotenko S, Herbomel P, Lutfalla G, Levraud JP. 2009. The two groups of zebrafish virus-induced interferons signal via distinct receptors with specific and shared chains. J Immunol. 183(6):3924–3931 - PubMed
    1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry [ATSDR]. 2021. Toxicological Profile for Perfluoroalkyls. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. - PubMed
    1. Andrews D, and Naidenko O. 2020. Population-wide exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from drinking water in the United States. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 7:931–936.
    1. Altmann S, Mellon M, Distel D, Kim C. 2003. Molecular and functional analysis of an interferon gene from the zebrafish, Danio rerio. J Virol. 77(3):1992–2002. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources