Characterizing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Credentialing in Pediatric Emergency Departments
- PMID: 38713835
- DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003193
Characterizing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Credentialing in Pediatric Emergency Departments
Abstract
Objective: It is unclear which pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) have a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) credentialing process or if this process is consistent per expert guidelines. Our objective was to describe formalized POCUS credentialing processes across PEDs that are active in the pediatric emergency medicine POCUS (P2) Network.
Methods: A survey was developed from nationally recommended credentialing guidelines. This anonymous survey was sent out to the P2 Network comprising more than 230 members involved in pediatric POCUS. The survey was analyzed using descriptive analysis with counts and percentages.
Results: A total of 36 PEDs responded to the survey. All departments had a faculty member in charge of maintaining the credentialing process, and all faculty members had POCUS education available; 88.6% of education was scheduled didactics or bedside teaching. There were 80.6% of PEDs that had a process for internally credentialing faculty. Some PEDs offered protected education for POCUS, however, 44.8% had <50% of their faculty credentialed. There were 4 PEDs that offered incentives for completion of POCUS credentialing including salary bonuses; only 1 offered shift buy down as incentive. That PED had 100% of its faculty credentialed. All PEDs performed quality assurance on POCUS scans done in the ED, most done weekly. Billing for scans occurred in 26 PEDs. Skin/soft tissue and focused assessment with sonography for trauma were the 2 most common applications credentialed.
Conclusions: Among PEDs surveyed, there was a lack of standardization of POCUS resources and components of credentialing. Incentives may be beneficial in improving credentialing faculty and standardizing the credentialing process.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Gold DL, Marin JR, Haritos D, et al. Pediatric emergency medicine physicians' use of point-of-care ultrasound and barriers to implementation: a regional pilot study. AEM Educ Train . 2017;1:325–333.
-
- Marin JR, Lewiss RE; American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine, 2013-2014; Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (Reviewers); American College of Emergency Physicians, Pediatric Emergency Medicine Committee, 2013-2014; World Interactive Network Focused on Critical Ultrasound Board of Directors (reviewers); American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine 2013-2014; Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Reviewers; American College of Emergency Physicians Pediatric Emergency Medicine Committee 2013-2014; World Interactive Network Focused on Critical Ultrasound Board of Directors reviewers. Point-of-care ultrasonography by pediatric emergency physicians. Policy statement. Ann Emerg Med . 2015;65:472–478.
-
- Beeson MS, Carter WA, Christopher TA, et al. Emergency medicine milestones. J Grad Med Educ . 2013;5(1 Suppl 1):5–13.
-
- Kim DJ, Thiessen M, Strony R. Point-of-care ultrasound credentialing: big picture principles for big health systems. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf . 2020;46:435–437.
-
- Toffoli A, Hartnett L, Mattick A, et al. Credentialing of emergency medicine trainees in point-of-care ultrasound: an effective, efficient and enjoyable model. Emerg Med Australas . 2021;33:473–479.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
