Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):4810-4820.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001543.

Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: the KLASS-07: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: the KLASS-07: a randomized controlled trial

Shin-Hoo Park et al. Int J Surg. .

Abstract

Backgrounds: Strong evidence is lacking as no confirmatory randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the efficacy of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) with laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). The authors performed an RCT to confirm if TLDG is different from LADG.

Methods: The KLASS-07 trial is a multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, phase III, RCT of 442 patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer. Patients were enroled from 21 cancer care centres in South Korea between January 2018 and September 2020 and randomized to undergo TLDG or LADG using blocked randomization with a 1:1 allocation ratio, stratified by the participating investigators. Patients were treated through R0 resections by TLDG or LADG as the full analysis set of the KLASS-07 trial. The primary endpoint was morbidity within postoperative day 30, and the secondary endpoint was quality of life (QoL) for 1 year. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03393182).

Results: Four hundred forty-two patients were randomized (222 to TLDG, 220 to LADG), and 422 patients were included in the pure analysis (213 and 209, respectively). The overall complication rate did not differ between the two groups (TLDG vs. LADG: 12.2% vs. 17.2%). However, TLDG provided less postoperative ileus and pulmonary complications than LADG (0.9% vs. 5.7%, P= 0.006; and 0.5% vs. 4.3%, P= 0.035, respectively). The QoL was better after TLDG than after LADG regarding emotional functioning at 6 months, pain at 3 months, anxiety at 3 and 6 months, and body image at 3 and 6 months (all P< 0.05). However, these QoL differences were resolved at 1 year.

Conclusions: The KLASS-07 trial confirmed that TLDG is not different from LADG in terms of postoperative complications but has the advantages to reduce ileus and pulmonary complications. TLDG can be a good option to offer better QoL in terms of pain, body image, emotion, and anxiety at 3-6 months.

Plain language summary

JOURNAL/ijos/04.03/01279778-202408000-00031/figure1/v/2025-08-24T172537Z/r/image-jpeg.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.P. reported receiving grants from Medtronic, Ltd (ERP 2017-10901). All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study 07 randomized clinical trial. LADG, laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy; TLDG, totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of morbidities according to patient subgroups. AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; LADG, laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy; TLDG, totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Quality of life (QoL) measurements of the totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy group (n=213) and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy group (n=209) using the Korean version of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire. (A) C30 emotional functioning. (B) C30 pain. (C) STO22 anxiety. (D) STO22 body image.
None

References

    1. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. . Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2005;241:232–237. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Park YK, et al. . Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: The KLASS-02-RCT Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:3304–3313. - PubMed
    1. Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, et al. . Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer 2017;20:699–708. - PubMed
    1. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, et al. . Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 2016;263:28–35. - PubMed
    1. Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, et al. . Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 Lymphadenectomy to open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg 2019;270:983–991. - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources