Risk assessment for pancreatic fistula by intraoperative image analysis of laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy
- PMID: 38719986
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10856-1
Risk assessment for pancreatic fistula by intraoperative image analysis of laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic fistula (PF) is one of the most serious postoperative complications of gastrectomy. Misidentification of the boundary between the pancreas and the dissected fat is a primary concern. In this study, we focused on differences in the appearance of the pancreas and the dissected fat in actual surgical images and statistically analyzed the relationship between the pancreas and the dissected fat.
Methods: We analyzed data from 109 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between November 2018 and March 2023. Intraoperative images were taken from videos of lymph node dissections of Nos.6 and 8a regions, and the mean gray value of the areas was measured using ImageJ software for analysis. The visceral fat area (VFA) was evaluated by preoperative axial CT at the umbilical level using Ziostation software.
Results: A significant correlation was observed between the fat/pancreas gray value ratio in the No.8a lymph node region and the drain/serum amylase ratio (P < 0.001). The fat/pancreas gray value ratio in the No.6 lymph node region correlated with VFA (P < 0.001). The VFA and drain/serum amylase ratio were significantly higher in the group with intra-abdominal complications (P = 0.004).
Conclusions: We revealed significant relationships between the fat/pancreas gray value ratio with drain/serum amylase and VFA. Detecting differences in gray values between the pancreas and the dissected fat may lead to a decrease in the drain/serum amylase ratio and PF.
Keywords: Gastric cancer; Minimally invasive surgery; Pancreatic fistula.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Robotic radical lymphadenectomy without touching the pancreas during gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(13):e15091. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015091. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 30921243 Free PMC article.
-
Pancreatic thickness as a predictor of postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic or robotic gastrectomy.Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5358-5367. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10021-0. Epub 2023 Mar 30. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36997651
-
Predictive factors for surgical complications of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Surg Endosc. 2009 Sep;23(9):2085-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0247-8. Epub 2008 Dec 31. Surg Endosc. 2009. PMID: 19116746
-
Is the measurement of drain amylase content useful for predicting pancreas-related complications after gastrectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy?World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 14;26(14):1594-1600. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i14.1594. World J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32327908 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: The largest meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2020 Oct;82:210-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.053. Epub 2020 Aug 12. Int J Surg. 2020. PMID: 32800976 Review.
Cited by
-
Visceral Obesity and a High Glasgow Prognostic Score Are Key Prognostic Factors for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with First Line Chemotherapy.J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024 Oct 25;8(4):383-392. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2024-052. eCollection 2024. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024. PMID: 39473717 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Morita S, Yamada T, Bando E, Ito S, Takagi M, Takagane A, Teshima S, Koeda K, Nunobe S, Yoshikawa T, Terashima M, Sasako M (2020) Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30332-2 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Etoh T, Ohyama T, Sakuramoto S, Tsuji T, Lee SW, Yoshida K, Koeda K, Hiki N, Kunisaki C, Tokunaga M, Otsubo D, Takagane A, Misawa K, Kinoshita T, Cho H, Doki Y, Nunobe S, Shiraishi N, Kitano S (2023) Five-year survival outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted vs open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: the JLSSG0901 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 158:445–454. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0096 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Hiki N, Honda M, Etoh T, Yoshida K, Kodera Y, Kakeji Y, Kumamaru H, Miyata H, Yamashita Y, Inomata M, Konno H, Seto Y, Kitano S (2018) Higher incidence of pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Real-world evidence from a Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study. Gastric Cancer 21:162–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0764-z - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tsujiura M, Hiki N, Ohashi M, Nunobe S, Kumagai K, Ida S, Okumura Y, Sano T, Yamaguchi T (2017) “Pancreas-compressionless gastrectomy”: a novel laparoscopic approach for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 24:3331–3337. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5974-4 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical