Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;71(3):492-503.
doi: 10.1111/inr.12984. Epub 2024 May 8.

Structured interactions between nurses and patients through intentional rounding: A scoping review

Affiliations

Structured interactions between nurses and patients through intentional rounding: A scoping review

Abdelrahman Al-Anati et al. Int Nurs Rev. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: To synthesize existing literature describing the impact of intentional rounding on patient outcomes among hospitalized adults.

Background: Intentional rounding has been described as purposeful therapeutic communication between nurses and patients during regular checks with patients using standardized protocols. Despite the widespread adoption of intentional rounding, the current understanding of the benefits of these structured interactions between nurses and patients is limited.

Introduction: The critical role of nurses in ensuring high-quality and safe care in acute hospitals is often noted only when things go wrong. This was highlighted by investigations into the reasons for the failures in patient care at the Mid Staffordshire National Health Services.

Methods: A scoping review was performed and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping review guidelines.

Findings: Sixteen studies were included in the final review. Various rounding models were noted among different clinical settings; four studies reported a significant reduction in falls, and a further three reported a decrease in pressure injuries. Two studies reported a reduction in call bell usage. Significant improvements in patients' satisfaction with intentional rounding were reported in three studies.

Discussion: Promoting intentional rounding without solid evidence of its acceptability, feasibility, and suitability in different clinical settings could compromise nurses' ability to provide safe care.

Conclusion and implications for nursing: There is weak evidence of the effectiveness of intentional rounding on patient outcomes because of the diversity of methods employed and methodological limitations in many studies. Our findings identify the need for robust studies to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a rounding protocol that can be implemented in different clinical settings.

Keywords: Clinical outcome; communication in health care; hourly round; intentional round; patient safety indicators; proactive round.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Al‐Anati, A., Molloy, L., Lafleur, C., Watts, G., Elmir, H. & Frost, S.A. (2024) Regarding ‘10 years on from the publication of the Francis report’. It is interesting to read ‘Nursing Notes on a Scandal’ (Rafferty & Leary, 2023). International Nursing Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12929
    1. Arksey, H. & O'Malley, L. (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
    1. Bridges, J., Griffiths, P., Oliver, E. & Pickering, R.M. (2019) Hospital nurse staffing and staff–patient interactions: an observational study. BMJ Quality & Safety, 28(9), 706–713. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs‐2018‐008948
    1. Brosey, L.A. & March, K.S. (2015) Effectiveness of structured hourly nurse rounding on patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 30(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1097/ncq.0000000000000086
    1. Christiansen, A., Coventry, L., Graham, R., Jacob, E., Twigg, D. & Whitehead, L. (2018) Intentional rounding in acute adult healthcare settings: a systematic mixed‐method review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(9–10), 1759–1792. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14370

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources