Calibration plots for multistate risk predictions models
- PMID: 38720592
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.10094
Calibration plots for multistate risk predictions models
Abstract
Introduction: There is currently no guidance on how to assess the calibration of multistate models used for risk prediction. We introduce several techniques that can be used to produce calibration plots for the transition probabilities of a multistate model, before assessing their performance in the presence of random and independent censoring through a simulation.
Methods: We studied pseudo-values based on the Aalen-Johansen estimator, binary logistic regression with inverse probability of censoring weights (BLR-IPCW), and multinomial logistic regression with inverse probability of censoring weights (MLR-IPCW). The MLR-IPCW approach results in a calibration scatter plot, providing extra insight about the calibration. We simulated data with varying levels of censoring and evaluated the ability of each method to estimate the calibration curve for a set of predicted transition probabilities. We also developed evaluated the calibration of a model predicting the incidence of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease among a cohort of patients derived from linked primary and secondary healthcare records.
Results: The pseudo-value, BLR-IPCW, and MLR-IPCW approaches give unbiased estimates of the calibration curves under random censoring. These methods remained predominately unbiased in the presence of independent censoring, even if the censoring mechanism was strongly associated with the outcome, with bias concentrated in low-density regions of predicted transition probability.
Conclusions: We recommend implementing either the pseudo-value or BLR-IPCW approaches to produce a calibration curve, combined with the MLR-IPCW approach to produce a calibration scatter plot. The methods have been incorporated into the "calibmsm" R package available on CRAN.
Keywords: calibration; clinical prediction; model validation; multistate model; risk prediction.
© 2024 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically III hospitalized adults. Chest. 1991;100(6):1619‐1636. doi:10.1378/chest.100.6.1619
-
- Jentzer JC, Bennett C, Wiley BM, et al. Predictive value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for mortality in a contemporary cardiac intensive care unit population. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(6):e008169. doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.008169
-
- Hippisley‐Cox J, Coupland C, Brindle P. Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2017;357(3):j2099. doi:10.1136/bmj.j2099
-
- D'Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2008;117(6):743‐753. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579
-
- Lim WS, Van Der Eerden MM, Laing R, et al. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003;58(5):377‐382. doi:10.1136/thorax.58.5.377
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical