Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2024 Apr 29;13(4):590-595.
doi: 10.21037/gs-23-508. Epub 2024 Apr 12.

The current status of minimally invasive pancreatectomy and implications of the Brescia guidelines

Hani M Annabi  1 , Preston B Adhikari  2 , Catherine H Davis  1   2
Affiliations
Editorial

The current status of minimally invasive pancreatectomy and implications of the Brescia guidelines

Hani M Annabi et al. Gland Surg. .
No abstract available

Keywords: Pancreas cancer; minimally invasive surgery; pancreatectomy; robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://gs.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/gs-23-508/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural development of the Brescia guidelines for minimally invasive pancreas surgery.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment on

  • The Brescia Internationally Validated European Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (EGUMIPS).
    Abu Hilal M, van Ramshorst TME, Boggi U, Dokmak S, Edwin B, Keck T, Khatkov I, Ahmad J, Al Saati H, Alseidi A, Azagra JS, Björnsson B, Can FM, D'Hondt M, Efanov M, Espin Alvarez F, Esposito A, Ferrari G, Groot Koerkamp B, Gumbs AA, Hogg ME, Huscher CGS, Ielpo B, Ivanecz A, Jang JY, Liu R, Luyer MDP, Menon K, Nakamura M, Piardi T, Saint-Marc O, White S, Yoon YS, Zerbi A, Bassi C, Berrevoet F, Chan C, Coimbra FJ, Conlon KCP, Cook A, Dervenis C, Falconi M, Ferrari C, Frigerio I, Fusai GK, De Oliveira ML, Pinna AD, Primrose JN, Sauvanet A, Serrablo A, Smadi S, Badran A, Baychorov M, Bannone E, van Bodegraven EA, Emmen AMLH, Giani A, de Graaf N, van Hilst J, Jones LR, Levi Sandri GB, Pulvirenti A, Ramera M, Rashidian N, Sahakyan MA, Uijterwijk BA, Zampedri P, Zwart MJW, Alfieri S, Berti S, Butturini G, Di Benedetto F, Ettorre GM, Giuliante F, Jovine E, Memeo R, Portolani N, Ruzzenente A, Salvia R, Siriwardena AK, Besselink MG, Asbun HJ; Collaborators. Abu Hilal M, et al. Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):45-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006006. Epub 2023 Jul 14. Ann Surg. 2024. PMID: 37450702 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, et al. Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiary center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009;16:731-40. 10.1007/s00534-009-0157-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215:810-9. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hakeem AR, Verbeke CS, Cairns A, et al. A matched-pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes using Leeds Pathology Protocol. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2014;13:435-41. 10.1016/S1499-3872(14)60048-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wei H, Wei B, Zheng Z, et al. Comparative study of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2014;17:465–8. - PubMed
    1. van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;4:199-207. 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30004-4 - DOI - PubMed