Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;43(7):1638-1647.
doi: 10.1002/etc.5881. Epub 2024 May 9.

Can Bees Detect Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)?

Affiliations

Can Bees Detect Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)?

Carolyn A Sonter et al. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

The European honey bee (Apis mellifera) is an important crop pollinator threatened by multiple stressors, including exposure to contaminants. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) is a persistent global contaminant that accumulates and biomagnifies in food chains and is detected in honey. Even sublethal exposure to PFOS is detrimental to bee health, but exposure routes are unclear and nothing is known about bee response (detection, avoidance, or attraction) to PFOS. Using Y-mazes, we studied the response of individual bees to PFOS-spiked sugar syrup at four concentrations, 0.02, 30, 61 and 103 µg L-1. Bee activity, choice behavior, and drink duration for unspiked and spiked sugar syrup was recorded for 10 min in the Y-maze system. Most bees (≥80%) tasted and then drank the sugar syrup solutions, including the PFOS-contaminated syrup. Only at 61 and 103 µg L-1 did bees significantly avoid drinking PFOS-spiked syrup, and only when given a choice with unspiked syrup. When the choice of consuming unspiked syrup was removed, the bees drank PFOS-spiked syrup at all the PFOS concentrations tested, and avoidance was not evident. Avoidance was not observed in any treatment at 0.02 or 30 µg L-1 PFOS, concentrations that are frequently reported in environmental waters in contaminated areas. These findings confirm that bees will access PFOS-contaminated resources at concentrations detrimental to the colony health, and provide evidence of potential exposure pathways that may threaten crop pollination services and also human health via food chain transfer in PFOS-contaminated areas. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;43:1638-1647. © 2024 SETAC.

Keywords: Adverse outcome pathway; Ecological risk assessment; Honey bees; Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abramson, C. I., Dinges, C. W., & Wells, H. (2016). Operant conditioning in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): The cap pushing response. PLoS One, 11(9), e0162347. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162347
    1. Aecom Australia Holdings. (2019). Interim monitoring event report—June 2019 RAAF Base Williamtown. https://www.defence.gov.au/Environment/PFAS/docs/Williamtown/Reports/201...
    1. Ahrens, L. (2011). Polyfluoroalkyl compounds in the aquatic environment: A review of their occurrence and fate. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 13(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0em00373e
    1. Australian Government Department of Health. (2017). Health based guidance values for per‐ and poly‐fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/2200FE086D...
    1. Bart, J., Fligner, M. A., & Notz, W. I. (1998). Sampling and statistical methods for behavioral ecologists. Cambridge University Press.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources