Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 9;42(1):310.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05023-z.

Radiation exposure of urologists during endourological procedures: a systematic review

Vincent De Coninck #  1   2 , Laura Hendrickx #  3 , Xavier Mortiers  4   3 , Bhaskar Somani  5 , Esteban Emiliani  6   7 , Emre Tarik Sener  6   8 , Amelia Pietropaolo  6   5 , Patrick Jones  9 , Andreas Skolarikos  10 , Thomas Tailly  11 , Stefan De Wachter  3 , Olivier Traxer  12   13 , Etienne Xavier Keller  6   14
Affiliations

Radiation exposure of urologists during endourological procedures: a systematic review

Vincent De Coninck et al. World J Urol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Ionizing radiation is used daily during endourological procedures. Despite the dangers of both deterministic and stochastic effects of radiation, there is a lack of knowledge and awareness among urologists. This study reviewed the literature to identify the radiation exposure (RE) of urologists during endourological procedures.

Methods: A literature search of the Medline, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases was conducted to collect articles related to the radiation dose to urologists during endourological procedures. A total of 1966 articles were screened. 21 publications met the inclusion criteria using the PRIMA standards.

Results: Twenty-one studies were included, of which 14 were prospective. There was a large variation in the mean RE to the urologist between studies. PCNL had the highest RE to the urologist, especially in the prone position. RE to the eyes and hands was highest in prone PCNL, compared to supine PCNL. Wearing a thyroid shield and lead apron resulted in a reduction of RE ranging between 94.1 and 100%. Educational courses about the possible dangers of radiation decreased RE and increased awareness among endourologists.

Conclusions: This is the first systematic review in the literature analyzing RE to urologists over a time period of more than four decades. Wearing protective garments such as lead glasses, a thyroid shield, and a lead apron are essential to protect the urologist from radiation. Educational courses on radiation should be encouraged to further reduce RE and increase awareness on the harmful effects of radiation, as the awareness of endourologists is currently very low.

Keywords: Endourology; Fluoroscopy; Lead shielding; PCNL; RIRS; Radiation; SWL; Systematic review; Ureteroscopy; Urolithiasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hamada N, Azizova TV, Little MP (2020) An update on effects of ionizing radiation exposure on the eye. Br J Radiol 93(1115):20190829. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190829 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller DT, Semins MJ (2021) Safety During Ureteroscopy: Radiation, Eyes, and Ergonomics. Front Surg. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.737337 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Söylemez H, Sancaktutar AA, Silay MS et al (2013) Knowledge and attitude of European urology residents about ionizing radiation. Urology 81(1):30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.097 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dudley AG, Semins MJ (2015) Radiation Practice Patterns and Exposure in the High-volume Endourologist. Urology 85(5):1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.060 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tzelves L, Somani B, Knoll T et al (2020) Level of knowledge on radiation exposure and compliance to wearing protective equipment: where do endourologists stand? An ESUT/EULIS survey. World J Urol 38(3):761–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02807-6 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources