Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Jun 1;142(6):548-558.
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.1269.

Pegcetacoplan Treatment and Consensus Features of Geographic Atrophy Over 24 Months

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pegcetacoplan Treatment and Consensus Features of Geographic Atrophy Over 24 Months

Dun Jack Fu et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Importance: Despite widespread availability and consensus on its advantages for detailed imaging of geographic atrophy (GA), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) might benefit from automated quantitative OCT analyses in GA diagnosis, monitoring, and reporting of its landmark clinical trials.

Objective: To analyze the association between pegcetacoplan and consensus GA SD-OCT end points.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a post hoc analysis of 11 614 SD-OCT volumes from 936 of the 1258 participants in 2 parallel phase 3 studies, the Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal APL-2 Therapy With Sham Injections in Patients With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (OAKS) and Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal APL-2 Therapy With Sham Injections in Patients With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration (DERBY). OAKS and DERBY were 24-month, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled studies conducted from August 2018 to July 2020 among adults with GA with total area 2.5 to 17.5 mm2 on fundus autofluorescence imaging (if multifocal, at least 1 lesion ≥1.25 mm2). This analysis was conducted from September to December 2023.

Interventions: Study participants received pegcetacoplan, 15 mg per 0.1-mL intravitreal injection, monthly or every other month, or sham injection monthly or every other month.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was the least squares mean change from baseline in area of retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy in each of the 3 treatment arms (pegcetacoplan monthly, pegcetacoplan every other month, and pooled sham [sham monthly and sham every other month]) at 24 months. Feature-specific area analysis was conducted by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) regions of interest (ie, foveal, parafoveal, and perifoveal).

Results: Among 936 participants, the mean (SD) age was 78.5 (7.22) years, and 570 participants (60.9%) were female. Pegcetacoplan, but not sham treatment, was associated with reduced growth rates of SD-OCT biomarkers for GA for up to 24 months. Reductions vs sham in least squares mean (SE) change from baseline of retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy area were detectable at every time point from 3 through 24 months (least squares mean difference vs pooled sham at month 24, pegcetacoplan monthly: -0.86 mm2; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.57; P < .001; pegcetacoplan every other month: -0.69 mm2; 95% CI, -0.98 to -0.39; P < .001). This association was more pronounced with more frequent dosing (pegcetacoplan monthly vs pegcetacoplan every other month at month 24: -0.17 mm2; 95% CI, -0.43 to 0.08; P = .17). Stronger associations were observed in the parafoveal and perifoveal regions for both pegcetacoplan monthly and pegcetacoplan every other month.

Conclusions and relevance: These findings offer additional insight into the potential effects of pegcetacoplan on the development of GA, including potential effects on the retinal pigment epithelium and photoreceptors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03525600 and NCT03525613.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Fu reported consulting fees and research support from AbbVie, Allergan, and Roche and research support from National Institute for Health and Care Research, Moorfields Eye Hospital, during the conduct of the study as well as grants from AbbVie outside the submitted work. Dr Keane reported speaker and advisory board fees from Apellis during the conduct of the study as well as personal fees from Roche, Novartis, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Topcon, Zeiss, and AbbVie outside the submitted work. Dr McKeown reported employment at Apellis Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work; in addition, Dr McKeown had a patent for Methods of Using Geographic Atrophy Lesion Characteristics pending. Dr Scheibler reported employment at Apellis during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work and in this role approved funding for this work; in addition, Dr Scheibler had a patent for Methods of Using Geographic Atrophy Lesion Characteristics pending. Dr Patel reported personal fees from Roche UK outside the submitted work. Dr Moghul reported he is a director and shareholder of Phenopolis. Dr Balaskas reported personal fees from Novartis, Bayer, Allergan, Heidelberg Engineering, Roche, and Alimera and grants from Novartis, Bayer, and Apellis outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Segmentation of Geographic Atrophy (GA) Features From Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) Imaging
For each SD-OCT volume, all B-scans were segmented for photoreceptor degeneration (PRD), retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) loss, hypertransmission (HTR), and RPE and outer retinal atrophy (RORA). RORA was taken to be overlapping regions of the 3 former features—that is, co-occurrence as per A-scan. Exemplar segmentation of a single B-scan and its axis along en face fundus photograph shown. Resultant feature probability maps from total volume segmentations collectively presented by projection onto en face fundus photograph. AI indicates artificial intelligence.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Association Between Pegcetacoplan and Geographic Atrophy (GA) Features at the Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) Level
The figure shows differences between treatment groups in least square mean (LSM) mean change in area of GA features from baseline. SD-OCT GA features considered were retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) loss and outer retinal atrophy (RORA), RPE loss, hypertransmission, photoreceptor degeneration (PRD), and PRD in isolation in study eyes. Changes within total Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study regions were considered. Graphs show LSMs and SEs (error bars) by treatment group and time postbaseline, which were estimated from a mixed-effects model with a random intercept at the level of the participant that included the following as cross-level interactions: treatment, presence of choroidal neovascularization in the fellow eye (yes or no), baseline GA lesion area (<7.5 mm2 or ≥7.5 mm2), baseline SD-OCT GA feature, analysis visit, treatment × analysis visit, and baseline SD-OCT GA feature × analysis visit. EOM indicates every other month.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Least-Squares Mean (LSM) Change in Normal-Luminance Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (NL-BCVA) Score
The figure shows differences between treatment groups in LSM change in NL-BCVA in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score from baseline. The graph shows LSMs and SEs (error bars) by treatment group and time postbaseline, which were estimated from a mixed-effects model with a random intercept at the level of the participant that included the following as cross-level interactions: treatment, baseline geographic atrophy lesion area (<7.5 mm2 or ≥7.5 mm2); baseline BCVA score; analysis visit; baseline presence of choroidal neovascularization in the fellow eye (yes or no); analysis visit × treatment; baseline BCVA score × analysis visit. EOM indicates every other month.

Comment on

References

    1. Lim LS, Mitchell P, Seddon JM, Holz FG, Wong TY. Age-related macular degeneration. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1728-1738. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60282-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Sadda S, Staurenghi G, Chew EY, Fleckenstein M, Holz FG; CAM (Classification of Atrophy Meeting)-Group . Geographic atrophy: semantic considerations and literature review. Retina. 2016;36(12):2250-2264. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000001258 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gass JD. Drusen and disciform macular detachment and degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1973;90(3):206-217. doi:10.1001/archopht.1973.01000050208006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Csaky KG, Richman EA, Ferris FL III. Report from the NEI/FDA Ophthalmic Clinical Trial Design and Endpoints Symposium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(2):479-489. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1132 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sadda SR, Chakravarthy U, Birch DG, Staurenghi G, Henry EC, Brittain C. Clinical endpoints for the study of geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2016;36(10):1806-1822. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000001283 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data