Feeding Tube Clinic Effect on Nutrition
- PMID: 38722739
- DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001277
Feeding Tube Clinic Effect on Nutrition
Abstract
Background: Optimizing nutrition is essential for recovery after major surgery or severe illness. Feeding tubes (FT) can be placed in patients limited by oral enteral nutrition. Given the myriad of locations in which these procedures are performed (radiology, intensive care unit, and endoscopy suite), routine follow-up is challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of an FT clinic on nutrition. We hypothesized that enrollment in the FT clinic would result in improved nutritional outcomes.
Methods: Retrospective review of Veteran Affairs Medical Center patients with FTs placed from January 2010 to January 2020. Demographics and body mass index (BMI) were recorded. Serum albumin recorded within 1 month of tube placement was compared to within 1 month of tube removal, death, or at the end of the study period. FT clinic participation required at least 2 visits. Indications for FT placement and duration were recorded. Patients were excluded when both BMI and albumin values were incomplete, and if FTs were placed for decompression.
Results: Ninety-three patients underwent FT placement during the study period; 5 (5%) were excluded. The average age was 64.8±9.7 years, with the majority being male, 85 patients (97%). Eighteen (20%) patients were seen in the FT clinic (FTC) and 70 (80%) were managed outside of FTC (nFTC). There were no differences in age, gender, or indication for FT. Mean albumin increased 0.42±0.85 g/dL in the FTC group versus -0.07±0.72 g/dL in the nFTC group ( P =0.037). The FTC group BMI increased, 0.38 kg/m 2 vs. -1.48 kg/m 2 in nFTC patients, P =0.041. The FTC patients maintained their tubes longer (36.5 vs. 7.0 mo, P =0.0014).
Conclusions: Patients managed in a dedicated FT clinic experienced an improvement in their serum albumin values and increases in their BMI. In addition, they also maintained their FTs longer. To optimize nutrition and reduce weight loss, patients who require FTs should be enrolled in a dedicated FT clinic.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
E.L.J. is a consultant for Boston Scientific and provided expert testimony for Chris Jones Esq. and Harvard Risk Management. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Compher C, Bingham AL, McCall M, et al. Guidelines for the provision of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022;46:12–41.
-
- Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, et al. ESPEN practical guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:4745–4761.
-
- Law AC, Stevens JP, Walkey AJ. Gastrostomy tube use in the critically ill, 1994-2014. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16:724–730.
-
- Law AC, Stevens JP, Choi E, et al. Days out of institution after tracheostomy and gastrostomy placement in critically ill older adults. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022;19:424–432.
-
- Schattner MA, Willis HJ, Raykher A, et al. Long-term enteral nutrition facilitates optimization of body weight. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2005;29:198–203.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources