Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 15;32(16):747-753.
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00577. Epub 2024 May 8.

Frequent Sural Nerve Injury with Posterior Approach for Ankle Fracture Fixation

Natasha M Simske  1 , Halle Kotchman, Caroline Pennacchio, Ian Dorney, Heather A Vallier
Affiliations

Frequent Sural Nerve Injury with Posterior Approach for Ankle Fracture Fixation

Natasha M Simske et al. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to report the incidence of iatrogenic sural nerve injury in a large, consecutive sample of surgically managed ankle fractures and to identify factors associated with sural nerve injury and subsequent recovery. We hypothesize that a direct posterior approach may be associated with higher risk of iatrogenic sural nerve injury.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 265 skeletally mature patients who sustained ankle fractures over a 2-year period was done. All were treated with open reduction and internal fixation of fractured malleoli. Patient, injury, and treatment features were documented. The presence (n = 26, 9.8%) of sural nerve injury and recovery of sural nerve function were noted.

Results: All 26 sural nerve injuries were iatrogenic, occurring postoperatively after open reduction and internal fixation. Patients who sustained sural nerve injuries had more ankle fractures secondary to motor vehicle collisions (23.1% versus 9.2%), more associated trimalleolar fractures (69.2% versus 33.9%), and more Orthopaedic Trauma Association/AO 44B3 fractures (57.7% versus 25.1%), all P < 0.05. A posterior approach to the posterior malleolus through the prone position was used in 20.4% of patients. All 26 of the sural nerve injuries (100%) occurred when the patient was placed prone for a posterior approach, P < 0.001. Therefore, 26 of the 54 patients (48%) treated with a posterior approach sustained an iatrogenic sural nerve injury. 62% of patients had full recovery of sural nerve function with no residual numbness, and patients with nerve recovery had fewer associated fracture-dislocations (23.1% versus 100%, P = 0.003).

Conclusions: A posterior approach for posterior malleolus fixation was associated with a 48% iatrogenic sural nerve injury rate, with 62% recovering full function within 6 months of injury. Morbidity of this approach should be considered, and surgeons should be cautious with nerve handling.

Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Irwin TA, Lien J, Kadakia AR: Posterior malleolus fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013;21:32-40.
    1. Jaskulka RA, Ittner G, Schedl R: Fractures of the posterior tibial margin: Their role in the prognosis of malleolar fractures. J Trauma 1989;29:1565-1570.
    1. Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G: Adult ankle fractures: An increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69:43-47.
    1. Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Tuček M, Naňka O: Posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2015;41:587-600.
    1. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Reed SC, Hedman TP: Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: Biomechanical study of the ligamentous restraints. Arthroscopy 1994;10:558-560.

MeSH terms