Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 9;24(1):607.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11066-0.

Perceptions and outcomes of an embedded Alzheimer Society First Link Coordinator in rural primary health care memory clinics

Affiliations

Perceptions and outcomes of an embedded Alzheimer Society First Link Coordinator in rural primary health care memory clinics

Debra G Morgan et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Primary health care has a central role in dementia detection, diagnosis, and management, especially in low-resource rural areas. Care navigation is a strategy to improve integration and access to care, but little is known about how navigators can collaborate with rural primary care teams to support dementia care. In Saskatchewan, Canada, the RaDAR (Rural Dementia Action Research) team partnered with rural primary health care teams to implement interprofessional memory clinics that included an Alzheimer Society First Link Coordinator (FLC) in a navigator role. Study objectives were to examine FLC and clinic team member perspectives of the impact of FLC involvement, and analysis of Alzheimer Society data comparing outcomes associated with three types of navigator-client contacts.

Methods: This study used a mixed-method design. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with FLC (n = 3) and clinic team members (n = 6) involved in five clinics. Data were analyzed using thematic inductive analysis. A longitudinal retrospective analysis was conducted with previously collected Alzheimer Society First Link database records. Memory clinic clients were compared to self- and direct-referred clients in the geographic area of the clinics on time to first contact, duration, and number of contacts.

Results: Three key themes were identified in both FLC and team interviews: perceived benefits to patients and families of FLC involvement, benefits to memory clinic team members, and impact of rural location. Whereas other team members assessed the patient, only FLC focused on caregivers, providing emotional and psychological support, connection to services, and symptom management. Face-to-face contact helped FLC establish a relationship with caregivers that facilitated future contacts. Team members were relieved knowing caregiver needs were addressed and learned about dementia subtypes and available services they could recommend to non-clinic clients with dementia. Although challenges of rural location included fewer available services and travel challenges in winter, the FLC role was even more important because it may be the only support available.

Conclusions: FLC and team members identified perceived benefits of an embedded FLC for patients, caregivers, and themselves, many of which were linked to the FLC being in person.

Keywords: Care navigator; Caregiver support; Dementia; Memory clinic; Primary care; Rural; Team-based care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Use of lecanemab and donanemab in the Canadian healthcare system: Evidence, challenges, and areas for future research.
    Smith EE, Phillips NA, Feldman HH, Borrie M, Ganesh A, Henri-Bhargava A, Desmarais P, Frank A, Badhwar A, Barlow L, Bartha R, Best S, Bethell J, Bhangu J, Black SE, Bocti C, Bronskill SE, Burhan AM, Calon F, Camicioli R, Campbell B, Collins DL, Dadar M, DeMarco ML, Ducharme S, Duchesne S, Einstein G, Fisk JD, Gawryluk JR, Grossman L, Ismail Z, Itzhak I, Joshi M, Harrison A, Kröger E, Kumar S, Laforce R, Lanctot KL, Lau M, Lee L, Masellis M, Massoud F, Mitchell SB, Montero-Odasso M, Myers Barnett K, Nygaard HB, Pasternak SH, Peters J, Rajah MN, Robillard JM, Rockwood K, Rosa-Neto P, Seitz DP, Soucy JP, Trenaman SC, Wellington CL, Zadem A, Chertkow H; Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging Investigators. Smith EE, et al. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Mar;12(3):100068. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100068. Epub 2025 Jan 31. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025. PMID: 39893139 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. WHO Global Dementia Observatory (2023). Key figures. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/global-dementia-observatory-gdo. Accessed 29 Jan 2024.
    1. Skinner M, Hanlon N, editors. Ageing resource communities: new frontiers of rural population change, community development and voluntarism. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015.
    1. Bayly M, Morgan D, Chow AF, Kosteniuk J, Elliot V. Dementia-related education and support service availability, accessibility, and use in rural areas: barriers and solutions. Can J Aging. 2020;39(4):545–585. doi: 10.1017/S0714980819000564. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dal Bello-Haas VP, Cammer A, Morgan D, Stewart N, Kosteniuk J. Rural and remote dementia care challenges and needs: perspectives of formal and informal care providers residing in Saskatchewan, Canada. Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(3):192–204. - PubMed
    1. Gibson A, Holmes SD, Fields NL, Richardson VE. Providing care for persons with dementia in rural communities: Informal caregivers’ perceptions of supports and services. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2019;62(6):630–648. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2019.1636332. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types