Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 9;28(1):154.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04937-9.

Past, present, and future of sustainable intensive care: narrative review and a large hospital system experience

Affiliations
Review

Past, present, and future of sustainable intensive care: narrative review and a large hospital system experience

Faisal N Masud et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Healthcare systems are large contributors to global emissions, and intensive care units (ICUs) are a complex and resource-intensive component of these systems. Recent global movements in sustainability initiatives, led mostly by Europe and Oceania, have tried to mitigate ICUs' notable environmental impact with varying success. However, there exists a significant gap in the U.S. knowledge and published literature related to sustainability in the ICU. After a narrative review of the literature and related industry standards, we share our experience with a Green ICU initiative at a large hospital system in Texas. Our process has led to a 3-step pathway to inform similar initiatives for sustainable (green) critical care. This pathway involves (1) establishing a baseline by quantifying the status quo carbon footprint of the affected ICU as well as the cumulative footprint of all the ICUs in the healthcare system; (2) forming alliances and partnerships to target each major source of these pollutants and implement specific intervention programs that reduce the ICU-related greenhouse gas emissions and solid waste; and (3) finally to implement a systemwide Green ICU which requires the creation of multiple parallel pathways that marshal the resources at the grass-roots level to engage the ICU staff and institutionalize a mindset that recognizes and respects the impact of ICU functions on our environment. It is expected that such a systems-based multi-stakeholder approach would pave the way for improved sustainability in critical care.

Keywords: Critical care; Environmental policy; Environmentalism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the porposed pathway for sustainable (Green) ICUs

References

    1. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Causes of climate change. 2021 [cited 2024 Feb 17]. https://www.epa.gov/climatechange-science/causes-climate-change. Accessed 17 Feb 2024.
    1. Lenzen M, Malik A, Li M, Fry J, Weisz H, Pichler P-P, et al. The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment. Lancet Planet Health. 2020;4:e271–e279. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30121-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eckelman MJ, Huang K, Lagasse R, Senay E, Dubrow R, Sherman JD. Health care pollution and public health damage in the United States: an update. Health Aff. 2020;39:2071–2079. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01247. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malik A, Lenzen M, McAlister S, McGain F. The carbon footprint of Australian health care. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2018;2:e27–35. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30180-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu R. The carbon footprint of the Chinese health-care system: an environmentally extended input–output and structural path analysis study. Lancet Planet Health. 2019;3:e413–e419. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30192-5. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources