Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians compared to their younger counterparts: a retrospective observational study
- PMID: 38725804
- PMCID: PMC11076947
- DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.5.248
Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians compared to their younger counterparts: a retrospective observational study
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to analyze the association between age and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) by comparing postoperative outcomes between octogenarians and younger patients.
Methods: From November 1994 to December 2022, 1,585 internal carotid arteries of 1,434 patients were enrolled. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: octogenarians (≥80 years old) and non-octogenarians (<80 years old). Primary endpoints were early (≤30 days) outcomes of ipsilateral stroke, any stroke, myocardial infarction, death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We also compared overall any stroke and death between the 2 groups.
Results: One of 132 octogenarians (0.8%) and 17 of 1,453 non-octogenarians (1.1%) experienced ipsilateral stroke within 30 days. Thirty-day MACE occurred in 4 of 132 octogenarians (3%) and 44 of 1,453 non-octogenarians (3%). There were no significant differences in any early (≤30 days) outcomes. Symptomatic status was associated with increased 30-day MACE (odds ratio [OR], 2.610; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.450-4.696; P = 0.003) and 30-day any stroke (OR, 3.999; 95% CI, 1.627-9.828; P = 0.003). Symptomatic status was also associated with overall any stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 2.885; 95% CI, 1.865-4.463; P < 0.001), but age of ≥80 years was not associated with 30-day MACE, 30-day any stroke, or overall stroke. Age of ≥80 years was only associated with overall survival (HR, 2.644; 95% CI, 1.967-3.555; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: CEA would be a safe and effective treatment for octogenarians with low 30-day complications and long-term stroke rates, comparable with that of younger counterparts. Advanced age is not a contraindication for CEA.
Keywords: Aged; Carotid endarterectomy; Carotid stenosis; Treatment outcome.
Copyright © 2024, the Korean Surgical Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
References
-
- AbuRahma AF, Avgerinos ED, Chang RW, Darling RC, 3rd, Duncan AA, Forbes TL, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 2022;75(1S):4S–22S. - PubMed
-
- Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1493–1501. - PubMed
-
- Schneider JR, Jackson CR, Helenowski IB, Verta MJ, Wilkinson JB, Kim S, et al. A comparison of results of carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians to younger patients from the Mid-America Vascular Study Group and the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65:1643–1652. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources