Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Apr 26;35(2):386-395.
doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2024.1648. Epub 2024 Apr 26.

Comparison of local massage, steroid injection, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy efficacy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of local massage, steroid injection, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy efficacy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis

Baki Volkan Çetin et al. Jt Dis Relat Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with lateral epicondylitis (LE) treated with local massage, corticosteroid (CS) injection, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT).

Patients and methods: This randomized prospective study included 52 patients. Patients treated with local massage in Group 1 (n=17; 9 males, 8 females; mean age: 46.1±10.9 years; range, 27 to 64 years), CS injection in Group 2 (n=17; 7 males, 10 females; mean age: 46.0±8.8 years; range, 28 to 63 years), and ESWT in Group 3 (n=18; 12 males, 6 females; mean age: 46.7±11.3 years; range, 28 to 68 years) for LE were evaluated between March 2021 and June 2022. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), and DASH-Work Model (DASH-WM) scoring systems at the initial examination at the beginning of the study and at two-week, three-month, and six-month follow-up controls.

Results: Similar results were observed between VAS, DASH, and DASH-WM scores measured during LE diagnosis. In the first two weeks of follow-up, statistically significant decreases were observed in VAS, DASH, and DASH-WM scores in all three groups. Compared to baseline values, Group 1 and 2 had significant difference in VAS and DASH scores at three months. Group 3 had a significant difference in all clinical evaluation scores. At six months, no significant difference was observed in Groups 1 and 2 in any of the scoring systems, while Group 3 showed significant improvements in all scoring systems.

Conclusion: Treatment with ESWT was superior to other treatments throughout the study and at the final follow-up. In patients receiving CS injections, the clinical outcomes worsened with time, evidenced by the six-month follow-up. Further studies on combined treatment modalities are needed on this subject.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of the patients diagnosed with LE receiving local massage therapy, CS injection, and ESWT.: LE: Lateral epicondylitis; CS: Corticosteroid; ESWT: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy
Figure 2
Figure 2. The VAS scores of Groups 1, 2, and 3.: VAS: Visual Analog Scale; CS Inj: Corticosteroid injections; ESWT: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy
Figure 3
Figure 3. The DASH scores of Groups 1, 2, and 3.: DASH: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; CS Inj: Corticosteroid injections; ESWT: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy.
Figure 4
Figure 4. The DASH-WM scores of Groups 1, 2, and 3.: DASH-WM: Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand-work model; CS Inj: Corticosteroid injections; ESWT: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Patients switching treatment.: ESWT: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy; CS: Corticosteroid.
Figure 6
Figure 6. The VAS, DASH, and DASH-WM scores of patients removed from the groups.: VAS: Visual Analog Scale; DASH: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; DASH-WM: Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand-work model.

References

    1. Regan W, Wold LE, Coonrad R, Morrey BF. Microscopic histopathology of chronic refractory lateral epicondylitis. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:746–749. doi: 10.1177/036354659202000618. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yaka H, Başbuğ V, Tekin AA, Özer M. Evaluation of the relationship between lateral epicondylitis and vitamin D. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022;33:414–418. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.686. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Runge F. Zur RF. Genese und behandlung des schreibekramfes. Berlin: Klin Wochenschr. 1873;10:245–248.
    1. Rio E, Moseley L, Purdam C, Samiric T, Kidgell D, Pearce AJ, et al. The pain of tendinopathy: Physiological or pathophysiological. Sports Med. 2014;44:9–23. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0096-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alfredson H, Ljung BO, Thorsen K, Lorentzon R. In vivo investigation of ECRB tendons with microdialysis technique--no signs of inflammation but high amounts of glutamate in tennis elbow. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:475–479. doi: 10.1080/000164700317381162. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types