Radiofrequency ablation-Real-time visualization of lesions and their correlation with underlying parameters
- PMID: 38728067
- DOI: 10.1111/pace.14992
Radiofrequency ablation-Real-time visualization of lesions and their correlation with underlying parameters
Abstract
Background: Lesion durability and transmurality are crucial for successful radiofrequency (RF) ablation. This study provides a model of real-time RF lesion visualization and insights into the role of underlying parameters, as local impedance (LI).
Methods: A force-sensing, LI-sensing catheter was used for lesion creation in an ex vivo model involving cross-sections of porcine cardiac preparations. During 60 s of RF application, one measurement per second was performed regarding lesion size and available ablation parameters. In total, 1847 measurements from n = 36 lesions were performed. Power (20-50 W) and contact force (1-5 g, 10-15 g, 20-25 g) were systematically alternated.
Results: Lesion formation was most prominent in the first seconds of RF application during which nonlinear lesion growth was observed (max. 1.08 mm/s for lesion depth and 2.71 mm/s for lesion diameter). Power levels determined the extent of lesion formation in the early phase. After 20 s, lesion size growth velocity approaches 0.1 mm/s at all power levels. LI changes were also highest in the first seconds (up to - 12 Ω/s) and decreased to less than - 0.1Ω/s after prolonged application.
Conclusion: Lesion formation in irrigated RF ablation is a nonlinear process. Final lesion size resulting from an RF application is mainly influenced by high rates of lesion growth in the first seconds of ablation. LI seems to be a good surrogate for differentiating changes in lesion formation.
Keywords: lesion formation; local impedance; radiofrequency ablation.
© 2024 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Habibi M, Berger RD, Calkins H. Radiofrequency ablation: technological trends, challenges, and opportunities. Europace. 2021;23:511‐519.
-
- Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Martin CA, et al. Temperature‐ and flow‐controlled ablation/very‐high‐power short‐duration ablation vs conventional power‐controlled ablation: comparison of focal and linear lesion characteristics. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18:553‐561.
-
- Bates AP, Paisey J, Yue A, Banks P, Roberts PR, Ullah W. Radiofrequency ablation of the diseased human left ventricle: biophysical and electrogram‐based analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023;9:330‐340.
-
- Nakagawa H, Wittkampf FHM, Jackman WM. Can we produce deeper radiofrequency lesions? JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:1111‐1113.
-
- Chu GS, Calvert P, Futyma P, Ding WY, Snowdon R, Gupta D. Local impedance for the optimization of radiofrequency lesion delivery: a review of bench and clinical data. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021;33:389‐400.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources