Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 10;15(1):3937.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47574-0.

Pretreatment with IL-15 and IL-18 rescues natural killer cells from granzyme B-mediated apoptosis after cryopreservation

Affiliations

Pretreatment with IL-15 and IL-18 rescues natural killer cells from granzyme B-mediated apoptosis after cryopreservation

Abdulla Berjis et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Human natural killer (NK) cell-based therapies are under assessment for treating various cancers, but cryopreservation reduces both the recovery and function of NK cells, thereby limiting their therapeutic feasibility. Using cryopreservation protocols optimized for T cells, here we find that ~75% of NK cells die within 24 h post-thaw, with the remaining cells displaying reduced cytotoxicity. Using CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing and confocal microscopy, we find that cryopreserved NK cells largely die via apoptosis initiated by leakage of granzyme B from cytotoxic vesicles. Pretreatment of NK cells with a combination of Interleukins-15 (IL-15) and IL-18 prior to cryopreservation improves NK cell recovery to ~90-100% and enables equal tumour control in a xenograft model of disseminated Raji cell lymphoma compared to non-cryopreserved NK cells. The mechanism of IL-15 and IL-18-induced protection incorporates two mechanisms: a transient reduction in intracellular granzyme B levels via degranulation, and the induction of antiapoptotic genes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.B. and N.C.S. have submitted a Patent application covering aspects of this work. C.H.J. has received grant support from Novartis, and has patents related to CAR-Therapy with royalties paid from Novartis to the University of Pennsylvania. C.H.J. is also a scientific co-founder and holds equity in BlueWhale Bio, Capstan Therapeutics and Tmunity Therapeutics. He serves on the board of AC Immune and is a scientific advisor Alaunos, BluesphereBio, Cabaletta, Carisma, Cartography, Cellares, Cellcarta, Celldex, Danaher, Decheng, ImmuneSensor, Poseida, Verismo, Viracta, and WIRB-Copernicus group. L.L.L. is an advisor to Catamaran, Cullinan Oncology, Dragonfly, DrenBio, Edity, GV20, IMIDomics, InnDura Therapeutics, Innovent, Nkarta, oNKo-innate, Obsidian Therapeutics, and SBI Biotech. N.C.S. holds equity in Tmunity Therapeutics and BlueWhale Bio. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Characterizing NK cell recovery, phenotype, and function after cryopreservation.
a NK cell viability after thawing assessed via flow cytometry (n = 5 healthy donors). b NK cell recovery 24, 48, and 72 h after thawing in comparison to starting NK cell number at time 0 h after thawing (n = 10 healthy donors). c CD107A degranulation assay before and after thawing. NK cells were cultured with K562 cells at 1:1 effector:target ratio for 3 h (n = 4 healthy donors). d NK cytotoxicity assay before and after cryopreservation with B2M KO Raji cells (n = 4 healthy donors). e NK cytotoxicity assay before and after cryopreservation with K562 cells (n = 4 healthy donors). f ADCC assay using anti-CD20 antibody and Jeko-1 cells (n = 3 healthy donors). g Single-cell secretome profile of cryopreserved and non-cryopreserved NK cells treated with R848 for 24 h). Heatmap showing individual cytokines that NK cell secreted (n = 3 healthy donors). h Bulk RNA volcano plot comparing before, 24 and 72 h after cryopreservation (n = 5 healthy donors). i GSEA of IL-2-STAT5 pathway. Normality test was used to determine the distribution of the data then parametric test t test was used for (a, c). Two-way RM ANOVA was used for (df). The Benjamini–Hochberg method was used to obtain P value shown in (h). A two-tailed test was used for (a, c, h). g Error bars are shown as mean SD. All other graphs are shown as mean ± SEM.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. GZMB leakage induces apoptosis in NK cells after cryopreservation.
a NK cell recovery immediately before and after cryopreservation (n = 4 healthy donors). b Incucyte live imagining using caspase-3/7 cleavable dye to indicate early apoptosis (n = 4 healthy donors). c Incucyte live imagining using Cytox NIR dye to indicate loss of plasma membrane integrity (n = 4 healthy donors. d granzyme B levels at time 0 and 24 h after thawing (n = 5 healthy donors). e GZMB knockout NK cells recovery after cryopreservation (n = 4 healthy donors). f Perforin knockout NK cells recovery after cryopreservation (n = 4 healthy donors). g, h GZMB and mock KO NK cells were cocultured at 1 ratio of 1:10 in both directions to determine the role of fratricide in NK cell death (n = 4 healthy donors). i, j Confocal microscopy imaging showing the extent of colocalization of GZMB and LAMP-3, a marker for cytotoxic granules in fresh versus cryopreserved NK cells (fresh n = 29, cryopreserved n = 42). Normality test was used to determine the distribution of the data then parametric test t test was used for (a, d, e, f, h). nonparametric Mann–Whitney test was used for (i). A two-tailed test was used for (a, d, e, f, h, i). All graphs are shown as mean ± SEM.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. IL-15 + IL-18 pretreatment improves NK cell recovery and function after cryopreservation by inducing GZMB release and upregulating antiapoptotic genes.
a, b Pretreating NK cells with cytokines 24 h before cryopreservation (n = 10 healthy donors (a) and n = 6 healthy donors for (b). c GZMB MFI 24 h after vehicle or IL-12 treatment (n = 7 healthy donors). d NK cell-mediated killing assay using IL−15 + IL−18-pretreated NK cell before and after cryopreservation (n = 4 healthy donors). e Single-cell secretome profile of IL-15 + IL-18-treated cryopreserved and fresh NK cells treated with R848 for 24 h (n = 3 healthy donors). f CD107A degranulation after IL-15 + IL-18 treatment (n = 6 healthy donors). g Granzyme B ELISA 24 h after IL−15 + IL-18 treatment (n = 6 healthy donors). h Comparing MFI of IL-15 + IL-18-treated NK cells at 24- and 72-h post-treatment (n = 7 healthy donors). i Volcano plot comparing IL-15 + IL-18-treated vs untreated NK cells (n = 3 healthy donors). j Heatmap showing RNA levels using NanoString assay (n = 3 healthy donors). k MFI quantification of BCL2L1 after IL-15 + IL-18 treatment (n = 3 healthy donors). l Recovery of perforin KO and BCL2L1 KO NK cells with and without IL-15 + IL-18 pretreatment (n = 3 healthy donors). m IL-15 + IL-18-treated NK cell cryopreservation using GMP control rate freezer (n = 4 healthy donors). Normality test was used to determine the distribution of the data then parametric test t test was used for (c, g, k, l, m), nonparametric Wilcoxon matched pairs t test was used for (a, b, f, h). Two-way RM ANOVA was used for (d). The Benjamini–Hochberg method was used to obtain P value shown in (i, j). Two-tailed test was used for (ac, fm). e Error bars are shown as mean SD. All other graphs are shown as mean ± SEM.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Deep immunoprofiling of the vehicle and IL-15 + 18-treated NK cells after cryopreservation using cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF) reveals distinct changes in NK cell phenotypes.
a FlowSOM cluster map (n = 3 healthy donors). b individual marker expression in UMAP-1 (n = 3 healthy donors). c heatmap showing markers and expression levels in different clusters (n = 3 healthy donors). d UMAP showing NK cells distribution at different time points after thawing (n = 3 healthy donors).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. IL-15 + IL-18 pretreatment enables equipotent in vivo activity of cryopreserved and non-cryopreserved untreated NK cells.
a Schematic diagram for in vivo experiment. b Luminescent images of treated mice (n = 9 mice/group). c quantification of tumor burden (flux) (n = 9 mice/group). d NK cell number in the blood of treated mice (n = 9 mice/group). e Survival curve of NK treated mice (n = 9 mice/group) (e). Two-way ANOVA was used for (c). Normality test was used to determine the distribution of the data then parametric test t test was used for d. Simple survival analysis (Kaplan–Meier) with no data adjustment were made for (e). A two-tailed test was used for (d). All graphs are shown as mean ± SEM.

References

    1. Robertson MJ, Ritz J. Biology and clinical relevance of human natural killer cells. Blood. 1990;76:2421–2438. doi: 10.1182/blood.V76.12.2421.2421. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Long EO, Rajagopalan S. Stress signals activate natural killer cells. J. Exp. Med. 2002;196:1399–1402. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021747. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bottcher JP, et al. NK cells stimulate recruitment of cDC1 into the tumor microenvironment promoting cancer immune control. Cell. 2018;172:1022–1037 e1014. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirchhammer N, et al. NK cells with tissue-resident traits shape response to immunotherapy by inducing adaptive antitumor immunity. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022;14:eabm9043. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abm9043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoon SR, Kim TD, Choi I. Understanding of molecular mechanisms in natural killer cell therapy. Exp. Mol. Med. 2015;47:e141. doi: 10.1038/emm.2014.114. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types