Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 25;13(9):2515.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13092515.

Ultrasound-Guided Hip Injections with High Density Hyaluronic Acid: Outcome at One Year Follow Up

Antonino Giulio Battaglia  1 , Rocco D'Apolito  1 , Fabio Labionda  1 , Joil Ramazzotti  1 , Luigi Zagra  1
Affiliations

Ultrasound-Guided Hip Injections with High Density Hyaluronic Acid: Outcome at One Year Follow Up

Antonino Giulio Battaglia et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: The ultrasound-guided viscosupplementation of the hip joint with hyaluronic acid (HA) is considered a standard procedure among the conservative treatments for hip arthritis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit and the incidence of adverse events of the technique in an observational study at one year follow up. Methods: We evaluated a consecutive series of 85 patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic arthritis who underwent intra-articular ultrasound-guided hyaluronic acid injections. The scales used for evaluation were modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University), and Hip Outcome Score (HOS) with subscale Sport (HOSs), for pain the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS). The patients were classified according to Tonnis' radiological classification of arthritis (range 0-3): 20 patients (grade 0), 32 (grade 1), 18 (grade 2), 15 (grade 3). Results: At last follow up, all the scales increased: mHHS from 59.35 to 82.1, HOS from 69.45 to 78.53, HOss from 47.4 to 58.11, VAS from 6.09 to 3.97, WOMAC from 33.2 to 31.5 (p < 0.05 for all the parameters); the results were elaborated with GraphPad Prism v5.0 (Prism Software La Jolla, CA, USA) using Wilcoxon's test. A total of 13 patients out of 85 needed arthroplasty, all classified as Tonnis grade 3. No serious adverse events were noted due to the procedure. Conclusions: Based on our findings, indication for the use of hyaluronic acid is limited to patients with mild to moderate arthritis. Patients in advanced arthritis refusing replacement surgery and asking for this treatment should be informed about the poor results of the technique even in the short term.

Keywords: hip; hip preservation; hyaluronic acid; intra-articular injection; osteoarthritis; viscosupplementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Skin cleaned with antiseptic; sterile gel and probe used; (b) injection of HA intra-articular with a 20–22 G needle; (c) Follow the needle in the monitor to avoid extravasation, observing capsule and hip neck.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box and whisker plot showing the distribution of clinical scores at baseline and at 1 year.
Figure 3
Figure 3
STROBE diagram of hip injections outcomes;8 patients scheduled for THA waited less or more 1 y (Year); 5 are still waiting for surgery.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen K.D., Thoma L.M., Golightly Y.M. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2022;30:184–195. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.04.020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moss A., Murphy L., Helmick C., Schwartz T., Barbour K., Renner J., Kalsbeek W., Jordan J. Annual incidence rates of hip symptoms and three hip OA outcomes from a U.S. population-based cohort study: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016;24:1518–1527. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.04.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawrence R.C., Helmick C.G., Arnett F.C., Deyo R.A., Felson D.T., Giannini E.H., Heyse S.P., Hirsch R., Hochberg M.C., Hunder G.G., et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41:778–799. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5<778::AID-ART4>3.0.CO;2-V. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murphy L., Helmick C.G. The Impact of osteoarthritis in the United States: A population-health perspective: A population-based review of the fourth most common cause of hospitalization in U.S. adults. Orthop. Nurs. 2012;31:85–91. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0b013e31824fcd42. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iagnocco A. Imaging the joint in osteoarthritis: A place for ultrasound? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2010;24:27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.08.012. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources