Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 25;13(9):2529.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13092529.

Relative Contribution of Metabolic Syndrome Components in Relation to Obesity and Insulin Resistance in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Affiliations

Relative Contribution of Metabolic Syndrome Components in Relation to Obesity and Insulin Resistance in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Daniela Greere et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Introduction. Osteoporosis (OP) affects 30% of postmenopausal women, often complicated by metabolic syndrome (MetS) with a still controversial role. We aimed to characterize MetS and its components in relation to bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), and insulin resistance. Methods. Patients (n = 188) underwent DEXA scans, spine X-rays, and metabolic and hormonal investigations, including bone biomarkers, muscular strength, and physical performance tests, while insulin resistance was evaluated by the Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA-IR). Results. Patients with a normal BMD or osteopenia (n = 68) and with OP (n = 120) displayed 51.5% and 30.8% of MetS, but without differences in insulin resistance. When BMD was studied as a function of the cumulative MetS criteria and centiles of BMI, lower levels of BMD were observed beyond an inflection point of 27.2 kg/m2 for BMI, allowing for further stratification as lean and overweight/obese (OW/OB) subjects. In contrast with lean individuals (n = 74), in OW/OB patients (n = 46), MetS was associated with HbA1c (p < 0.0037, OR 9.6, 95% CI [1.64-55.6]) and insulin resistance (p < 0.0076, OR 6.7, 95% CI [1.49-30.8]) in the context where BMD values were lower than those predicted from BMI in non-OP subjects. In OP patients with fragility fractures (31% of MetS), glycemia also appeared to be the dominant factor for MetS (p < 0.0005, OR 4.1, 95% CI [1.63-10.39]). Conclusions. These data indicate a detrimental effect of insulin resistance in MetS on OP patients, while the prevalence of the syndrome depends on the proportion of obesity. These findings provide new insights into the pathogenic role of MetS and reveal the need to consider different strata of BMI and insulin resistance when studying postmenopausal OP.

Keywords: HOMA index; insulin resistance; metabolic syndrome; osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation between BMD and HOMA-IR index for insulin resistance as function of cumulative criteria for MetS and degree of obesity. (A) BMD at femoral neck, hip, and lumbar spine as function of cumulative criteria of MetS. (B) Variation in HOMA-IR as function of cumulative criteria of MetS. (C) Variation in BMD at femoral neck as function of centiles of BMI in non-OP, OP, and severe OP with fractures. (D) Variation in HOMA-IR index in patients without any criterion for MetS, 1, 2, and 3 to 5 criteria for MetS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
BMD at different anatomical sites in patients with osteoporosis and MetS compared to predicted values based on BMI. Predicted values of BMD as function of BMI were calculated in linear regression in subjects without osteoporosis (non-OP). Predicted values were then compared with actual values in non-OP and OP with MetS together (Panels (EH)) with the display of residuals (Panels (AD)).

References

    1. Kanis J. Assessment of Osteoporosis at the Primary Health Care Level Who Scientific Group Technical Report. 2007. [(accessed on 8 March 2024)]. Available online: https://frax.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/pdfs/WHO_Technical_Report.pdf.
    1. Cosman F., de Beur S.J., LeBoff M.S., Lewiecki E.M., Tanner B., Randall S., Lindsay R. Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Osteoporos. Int. 2014;25:2359–2381. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Facts & Statistics|International Osteoporosis Foundation. [(accessed on 8 March 2024)]. Available online: https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/facts-statistics.
    1. Grigorie D., Sucaliuc A., Johansson H., Kanis J.A., McCloskey E. Incidence of Hip Fracture in Romania and the Development of a Romanian FRAX Model. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2013;92:429–436. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9697-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wurtz P., Makinen V.-P., Soininen P., Kangas A.J., Tukiainen T., Kettunen J., Savolainen M.J., Tammelin T., Viikari J.S., Ronnemaa T., et al. Metabolic Signatures of Insulin Resistance in 7098 Young Adults. Diabetes. 2012;61:1372–1380. doi: 10.2337/db11-1355. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources