Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;26(8):101160.
doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101160. Epub 2024 May 8.

Health care utilization and behavior changes after workplace genetic testing at a large US health care system

Collaborators, Affiliations

Health care utilization and behavior changes after workplace genetic testing at a large US health care system

Elizabeth Charnysh et al. Genet Med. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: This study explored employee health behavior changes and health care utilization after workplace genetic testing (wGT). Wellness-program-associated wGT seeks to improve employee health, but the related health implications are unknown.

Methods: Employees of a large US health care system offering wGT (cancer, heart disease, and pharmacogenomics [PGx]) were sent electronic surveys. Self-reported data from those who received test results were analyzed. Descriptive statistics characterized responses, whereas logistic regression analyses explored correlates of responses to wGT.

Results: 53.9% (n = 418/776) of respondents (88.3% female, mean age = 44 years) reported receiving wGT results. 12.0% (n = 48/399) received results indicating increased risk (IR) of cancer, 9.5% (n = 38/398) had IR of heart disease, and 31.4% (n = 125/398) received informative PGx results. IR results for cancer and/or heart disease (n = 67) were associated with health behavior changes (adjusted odds ratio: 3.23; 95% CI 1.75, 6.13; P < .001) and health care utilization (adjusted odds ratio: 8.60; 95% CI 4.43, 17.5; P < .001). Informative PGx results (n = 125) were associated with medication changes (PGx-informative: 15.2%; PGx-uninformative: 4.8%; P = .002).

Conclusion: This study explored employee responses to wGT, contributing to the understanding of the ethical and social implications of wGT. Receiving IR results from wGT may promote health behavior changes and health care utilization in employees.

Keywords: Behavior changes; ELSI; Employees; Wellness programs; Workplace genetic testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Goetzel RZ, Henke RM, Tabrizi M, et al. Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work? J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(9):927–934. - PubMed
    1. Mulder L, Belay B, Mukhtar Q, Lang JE, Harris D, Onufrak S. Prevalence of Workplace Health Practices and Policies in Hospitals: Results From the Workplace Health in America Study. Am J Health Promot. 2020;34(8):867–875. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sanghavi K, Feero WG, Mathews DJH, et al. Employees’ Views and Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Assessment of Voluntary Workplace Genomic Testing. Front Genet. 2021;12:643304. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sanghavi K, Cohn B, Prince AER, et al. Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora’s box? NPJ Genom Med. 2022;7(1):5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Briscoe F, Ajunwa I, Bourgoin A, Maxwell J. Racial Differences in Perceptions of Genetic Wellness Programs. Am J Health Promot. 2023;37(7):940–952. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources