Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 29;13(4):849-860.
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-17. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world, multicenter, retrospective study

Affiliations

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world, multicenter, retrospective study

Xun Wang et al. Transl Lung Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Background: Resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have a high risk of recurrence. Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy brings new hope for these patients. The study aims to evaluate the safety, surgery-related outcomes and oncological outcomes for neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in real-world setting with a large sample size and long-term follow-up.

Methods: Patients with clinical stage IB-IIIB NSCLC who received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy at two Chinese institutions were included in this retrospective cohort study. Surgical and oncological outcomes of the enrolled NSCLC patients were collected and analyzed.

Results: There were 158 patients identified, of which 124 (78.5%) were at stage IIIA-IIIB and the remaining 34 (21.5%) were at stage IB-IIB. Forty-one patients (25.9%) received two cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, 80 (50.6%) had three cycles, and 37 (23.4%) had four cycles. Twenty-four patients (15.2%) experienced grade 3 or worse immune-related adverse events. The median interval time between the last neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was 37 [interquartile range (IQR), 31-43] days. Fifty-eight out of 96 (60.4%) central NSCLC patients who were expected to undergo complex surgery had the scope or the difficulty of operation reduced. Ninety-five (60.1%) patients achieved major pathologic response (MPR), including 62 (39.2%) patients with pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate regression analysis showed that no clinical factor other than programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was predictive of the pathological response. The median follow-up time from diagnosis was 27.1 months. MPR and pCR were significantly associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Neither stage nor PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with long-term survival.

Conclusions: The neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy is a feasible strategy for NSCLC with a favorable rate of pCR/MPR, modified resection and 2-year survival. No clinical factor other than PD-L1 expression was predictive of the pathological response. pCR/MPR may be effective surrogate endpoint for survival in NSCLC patients who received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy.

Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); chemo-immunotherapy; neoadjuvant therapy; programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1); surgical extent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-24-17/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Imaging remission after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. MPR, major pathologic response; pCR, pathologic complete response.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to the pathological response. (A) Progression-free survival comparisons: MPR vs. non-MPR; (B) overall survival comparisons: MPR vs. non-MPR; (C) progression-free survival comparisons: pCR vs. non-pCR; (D) overall survival comparisons: pCR vs. non-pCR. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; MPR, major pathologic response; pCR, pathologic complete response.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-49. 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pfannschmidt J, Muley T, Bülzebruck H, et al. Prognostic assessment after surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer: experiences in 2083 patients. Lung Cancer 2007;55:371-7. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.10.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Postmus PE, Kerr KM, Oudkerk M, et al. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017;28:iv1-iv21. 10.1093/annonc/mdx222 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor MD, Nagji AS, Bhamidipati CM, et al. Tumor recurrence after complete resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:1813-20; discussion 1820-1. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedlaender A, Naidoo J, Banna GL, et al. Role and impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in neoadjuvant treatment for NSCLC. Cancer Treat Rev 2022;104:102350. Erratum in: Cancer Treat Rev 2022;104:102358. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102350 - DOI - PubMed