The Validity and Reliability of a Smartphone Application for Measuring Wrist and Metacarpophalangeal Joint Motion
- PMID: 38738165
- PMCID: PMC11088398
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58047
The Validity and Reliability of a Smartphone Application for Measuring Wrist and Metacarpophalangeal Joint Motion
Abstract
Background Accurate measurement of the range of motion (ROM) is crucial for guiding upper extremity rehabilitation. Inaccurate measurements can mislead clinicians and harm patient compliance. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of a smartphone application (Angulus) for measuring wrist and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint ROM. Methodology This study included 64 volunteers with no prior wrist injuries. The wrist flexion/extension, radial/ulnar deviation, and MCP joint flexion/extension ROM were assessed by an experienced physiotherapist (Assessor 1) using the Angulus and a standard two-arm goniometer. The validity of Angulus was evaluated by correlating it with the goniometer measurements using the Pearson correlation coefficient. For the reliability analysis, an inexperienced biomedical engineer (Assessor 2) performed the same measurements using Angulus twice in different sessions, in addition to Assessor 1. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results The mean age of the participants was 29.5 ± 8.2 years, with 62% being female. The validity of the Angulus app measurements was indicated by the adequate to excellent correlation between the Angulus and goniometer measurements (ranging from 0.44 to 0.81). The intra-rater reliability of the Angulus app was excellent for Assessor 1 (ranging from 0.76 to 0.90) and adequate to excellent for Assessor 2 (ranging from 0.71 to 0.88). The inter-rater reliability of Angulus was excellent (ranging from 0.91 to 0.96). Conclusions Angulus is a valid and reliable method to measure the wrist and MCP joint ROM.
Keywords: metacarpophalangeal joint; mobile phone application; range of motion (rom); reliability and validity; wrist evaluation.
Copyright © 2024, Özçelep et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Magee D. Orthopedic Physical Assessment, 6th ed. New York: Saunders; 2013. Orthopedic Physical Assessment.
-
- Economic impact of hand and wrist injuries: health-care costs and productivity costs in a population-based study. de Putter CE, Selles RW, Polinder S, Panneman MJ, Hovius SE, van Beeck EF. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:0. - PubMed
-
- Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study. Carter TI, Pansy B, Wolff AL, Hillstrom HJ, Backus SI, Lenhoff M, Wolfe SW. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34:1422–1428. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous