Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov 1;26(6):549-556.
doi: 10.4103/aja20249. Epub 2024 May 3.

Navigating the evolving diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer

Affiliations
Review

Navigating the evolving diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer

Fabio Zattoni et al. Asian J Androl. .

Abstract

In this nonsystematic review of the literature, we explored the changing landscape of detection and treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Through emphasizing improved cancer assessment with histology classification and genomics, we investigated key developments in PCa detection and risk stratification. The pivotal role of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the novel diagnostic pathway is examined, alongside the benefits and drawbacks of MRI-targeted biopsies for detection and tumor characterization. We also delved into treatment options, particularly active surveillance for intermediate-risk PCa. Outcomes are compared between intermediate- and low-risk patients, offering insights into tailored management. Surgical techniques, including Retzius-sparing surgery, precision prostatectomy, and partial prostatectomy for anterior cancer, are appraised. Each technique has the potential to enhance outcomes and minimize complications. Advancements in technology and radiobiology, including computed tomography (CT)/MRI imaging and positron emission tomography (PET) fusion, allow for precise dose adjustment and daily target monitoring with imaging-guided radiotherapy, opening new ways of tailoring patients' treatments. Finally, experimental therapeutic approaches such as focal therapy open new treatment frontiers, although they create new needs in tumor identification and tracking during and after the procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Zelic R, Garmo H, Zugna D, Stattin P, Richiardi L, et al. Predicting prostate cancer death with different pretreatment risk stratification tools: a head-to-head comparison in a nationwide cohort study. Eur Urol. 2020;77:180–8. - PubMed
    1. Pierorazio PM, Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int. 2013;111:753–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD, Nelson JB, Egevad L, et al. A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score. Eur Urol. 2016;69:428–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grogan J, Gupta R, Mahon KL, Stricker PD, Haynes AM, et al. Predictive value of the 2014 international society of urological pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up. BJU Int. 2017;120:651–8. - PubMed
    1. Esserman L. Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA. 2009;302:1685. - PubMed