Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Jun 11;331(22):1898-1909.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.5596.

Prognostic Value of Cardiovascular Biomarkers in the Population

Johannes Tobias Neumann  1   2   3   4 Raphael Twerenbold  1   2   3 Jessica Weimann  1   2 Christie M Ballantyne  5 Emelia J Benjamin  6   7 Simona Costanzo  8 James A de Lemos  9 Christopher R deFilippi  10 Augusto Di Castelnuovo  11 Chiara Donfrancesco  12 Marcus Dörr  13   14 Kai M Eggers  15 Gunnar Engström  16 Stephan B Felix  13   14 Marco M Ferrario  17 Ron T Gansevoort  18 Simona Giampaoli  19 Vilmantas Giedraitis  20 Pär Hedberg  21 Licia Iacoviello  8   22 Torben Jørgensen  23   24 Frank Kee  25 Wolfgang Koenig  26   27   28 Kari Kuulasmaa  29 Joshua R Lewis  30   31   32 Thiess Lorenz  1   2 Magnus N Lyngbakken  33   34 Christina Magnussen  1   2   3 Olle Melander  15 Matthias Nauck  14   35 Teemu J Niiranen  29   36   37 Peter M Nilsson  15 Michael H Olsen  38   39 Torbjorn Omland  33   34 Viktor Oskarsson  40 Luigi Palmieri  12 Anette Peters  28   41   42 Richard L Prince  30   31 Vazhma Qaderi  1   2 Ramachandran S Vasan  6   43 Veikko Salomaa  29 Susana Sans  44 J Gustav Smith  45 Stefan Söderberg  40 Barbara Thorand  41   42 Andrew M Tonkin  4 Hugh Tunstall-Pedoe  46 Giovanni Veronesi  17 Tetsu Watanabe  47 Masafumi Watanabe  47 Andreas M Zeiher  48   49 Tanja Zeller  1   2   3 Stefan Blankenberg  1   2   3 Francisco Ojeda  1   2
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Prognostic Value of Cardiovascular Biomarkers in the Population

Johannes Tobias Neumann et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Identification of individuals at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease within the population is important to inform primary prevention strategies.

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of routinely available cardiovascular biomarkers when added to established risk factors.

Design, setting, and participants: Individual-level analysis including data on cardiovascular biomarkers from 28 general population-based cohorts from 12 countries and 4 continents with assessments by participant age. The median follow-up was 11.8 years.

Exposure: Measurement of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, B-type natriuretic peptide, or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which included all fatal and nonfatal events. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, heart failure, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction. Subdistribution hazard ratios (HRs) for the association of biomarkers and outcomes were calculated after adjustment for established risk factors. The additional predictive value of the biomarkers was assessed using the C statistic and reclassification analyses.

Results: The analyses included 164 054 individuals (median age, 53.1 years [IQR, 42.7-62.9 years] and 52.4% were women). There were 17 211 incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. All biomarkers were significantly associated with incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (subdistribution HR per 1-SD change, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.11-1.16] for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I; 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12-1.23] for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T; 1.21 [95% CI, 1.18-1.24] for N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; 1.14 [95% CI, 1.08-1.22] for B-type natriuretic peptide; and 1.14 [95% CI, 1.12-1.16] for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) and all secondary outcomes. The addition of each single biomarker to a model that included established risk factors improved the C statistic. For 10-year incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in younger people (aged <65 years), the combination of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein resulted in a C statistic improvement from 0.812 (95% CI, 0.8021-0.8208) to 0.8194 (95% CI, 0.8089-0.8277). The combination of these biomarkers also improved reclassification compared with the conventional model. Improvements in risk prediction were most pronounced for the secondary outcomes of heart failure and all-cause mortality. The incremental value of biomarkers was greater in people aged 65 years or older vs younger people.

Conclusions and relevance: Cardiovascular biomarkers were strongly associated with fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and mortality. The addition of biomarkers to established risk factors led to only a small improvement in risk prediction metrics for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but was more favorable for heart failure and mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Neumann reported receiving personal fees from Roche, Siemens, Abbott, and PHC; having a patent pending on the use of a computing device to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction; and being a cofounder and shareholder of ART-EMIS Hamburg GmbH. Dr Twerenbold reported receiving grants from the German Center for Cardiovascular Research, the Kühne Foundation, the Joachim Herz Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Swiss Heart Foundation; receiving personal fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Psyros, Roche, Siemens, Singulex, and Thermo Scientific BRAHMS Biomarkers; having a patent pending on the use of a computing device to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction; and being a cofounder and shareholder of ART-EMIS Hamburg GmbH. Dr Ballantyne reported receiving grants from Abbott, Denka Seiken, and Roche. Dr Benjamin reported receiving grants from the Boston University School of Medicine. Dr de Lemos reported receiving grants from Roche Diagnostics and Abbott Diagnostics; receiving personal fees from Quidel Cardiovascular, Beckman Coulter, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Regeneron, Amgen, Verve Therapeutics, and Merck; and being involved with a patent issued to the University of Maryland. Dr deFilippi reported receiving grants from Roche Diagnostics, QuidelOrtho, Siemens Healthineers, FujiRebio, and Abbott Diagnostics; receiving personal fees from Roche Diagnostics, Abbott Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers, QuidelOrtho, Tosoh, and FujiRebio; and holding a patent that assesses differential risk for developing heart failure. Dr Eggers reported receiving personal fees from Roche Diagnostics. Dr Felix reported receiving personal fees from Bayer, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer. Dr Koenig reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, the Medicines Company, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Corvidia Therapeutics, OMEICOS Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Novo Nordisk, New Amsterdam Pharma, TenSixteen Bio, Esperion, LIB Therapeutics, Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Berlin-Chemie, and Sanofi and receiving nonfinancial support from Singulex, Dr Beckmann Pharma GmbH, Abbott, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Kuulasmaa reported receiving grants from the European Union and the Medical Research Council. Dr Magnussen reported receiving grants from the German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Deutsche Stiftung für Herzforschung, and the Rolf M. Schwiete Stiftung Foundation and receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Bayer, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Niiranen reported receiving grants from the European Union, the Finnish Research Council, the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, and the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research and receiving personal fees from Servier Finland and AstraZeneca. Dr Olsen reported receiving personal fees from Novo Nordisk, Teva, and AstraZeneca. Dr Omland reported receiving personal fees from Abbott Laboratories, Roche Diagnostics, Bayer, CardiNor, and Novo Nordisk; receiving grants from Abbott Laboratories; and receiving nonfinancial support from Roche Diagnostics, Novartis, ChromaDex, and CardiNor. Dr Vasan reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Salomaa reported receiving grants from the Juho Vainio Foundation and Bayer Ltd Research. Dr Söderberg reported receiving personal fees from Actelion Ltd. Dr Tonkin reported receiving personal fees from Novartis. Dr Zeiher reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Zeller reported having a patent pending on the use of a computing device to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction and being a cofounder and shareholder of ART-EMIS Hamburg GmbH. Dr Blankenberg reported receiving personal fees from Abbott Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Thermo Fisher, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi GSK, Lumira Dx, Novartis, and Amarin and having a contract with Siemens Helathineers within the Hamburg City Health Study. Dr Ojeda reported having a patent pending on the use of a computing device to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction and being a cofounder and shareholder of ART-EMIS Hamburg GmbH. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow of Publications, Cohorts, and Individuals by Exclusion Criteria
BNP indicates B-type natriuretic peptide; CRP, C-reactive protein; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-BNP.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Association of Biomarkers With Incident Cardiovascular Events
The data were plotted based on results from adjusted Cox models or Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models for the loge-transformed biomarker concentrations using penalized cubic splines. The x-axes contain the back-transformed values on a log scale (range, lowest reported value [or the limit of detection in the case of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and T] to the 99th percentile). The shading indicates the 95% CIs. The corresponding reference values vary per graph and are used specifically for each biomarker and event combination. The median follow-up time was 11.8 years (IQR, 6.2-18.0 years) for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, 13.0 years (IQR, 7.9-19.2 years) for all-cause mortality, 12.8 years (IQR, 6.2-19.3 years) for heart failure, 11.9 years (IQR, 6.3-17.7 years) for ischemic stroke, and 11.6 years (IQR, 6.2-17.8 years) for myocardial infarction. Additional data appear in eTable 6 and eTables 10-13 in Supplement 1.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Association of the Biomarkers of Interest With Incident Cardiovascular Events
NT-proBNP indicates N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. aHazard ratio (HR) per unit increase = exponential function(log[HR per 1-SD increase]/SD). bFirst possible/definite coronary heart disease or ischemic stroke event; coronary revascularization; or died of coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, or unclassifiable. cThe median follow-up was 11.8 years (IQR, 6.2-18.0 years) for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; all-cause mortality, 13.0 years (IQR, 7.9-19.2 years); heart failure, 12.8 years (IQR, 6.2-19.3 years); ischemic stroke, 11.9 years (IQR, 6.3-17.7 years); and myocardial infarction, 11.6 years (IQR, 6.2-17.8 years). dThese 3 biomarkers were combined into 1 model to investigate their independent effect on association.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Heat Maps Displaying the Changes in the C Statistic After the Addition of the Biomarker to the Base Model
The changes in the C statistic were based on Cox regression models for all-cause mortality and based on Fine and Gray models for the other outcomes. The C statistics were computed based on the 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year probabilities of any events. Additional data appear in eTable 6 and eTables 10-13 in Supplement 1. The analyses stratified by age appear in eTable 16 in Supplement 1.

Comment in

References

    1. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. ; ESC National Cardiac Societies; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227-3337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e596-e646. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. SCORE2 Working Group and ESC Cardiovascular Risk Collaboration . SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(25):2439-2454. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab309 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khan SS, Matsushita K, Sang Y, et al. ; Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium and the American Heart Association Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Science Advisory Group . Development and validation of the American Heart Association’s PREVENT equations. Circulation. 2024;149(6):430-449. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067626 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Westermann D, Neumann JT, Sörensen NA, Blankenberg S. High-sensitivity assays for troponin in patients with cardiac disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14(8):472-483. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.48 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms