Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;56(6):534-540.
doi: 10.1002/lsm.23797. Epub 2024 May 13.

Intraoral laser hair removal: A scoping review

Abigail Katz  1 , Ryan Rivera-Oyola  2 , Carrie Levinson  1 , Jessica G Labadie  2
Affiliations

Intraoral laser hair removal: A scoping review

Abigail Katz et al. Lasers Surg Med. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Intraoral hair growth is a debilitating side effect of flap or graft-based oropharyngeal reconstruction. There is no standardized treatment, but groups have successfully eradicated unwanted hair growth with intraoral laser hair removal. This scoping review assesses the utility of laser therapy in managing this condition.

Methods: This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Ovid Medline, Embase (Ovid) and Scopus were queried using index terms and keywords. Resulting articles were reviewed for inclusion by two independent reviewers against inclusion criteria and relevant data were extracted.

Results: The literature search yielded 297 articles, 22 of which met inclusion criteria. In total, 77 patients were treated: 38 patients with an Alexandrite laser, 19 with an Nd:YAG laser, 18 with a diode laser, and two with a CO2 laser. Complete response defined as 80% or more reduction in hair count was achieved in 70 patients (90%) and six patients (8%) achieved a partial response (10%-79% reduction in hair count). One patient (1%) with gray hair saw less than a 10% reduction in hair count. On average, 3.84 treatment sessions were needed, spaced 5.4 weeks apart. Treatments were well tolerated without major side effects.

Conclusions: This is the first scoping review assessing the utility of intraoral laser hair therapy and suggests it may be a safe and effective treatment. However, surgeons should advise preoperative hair removal when clinically feasible to mitigate this side effect as much as possible.

Keywords: IPL; ectopic hair growth; flap reconstruction; intraoral hair growth; laser hair removal.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Shields BE, Moye MS, Bayon R, Sperry SM, Wanat KA. A hairy situation: laser hair removal after oral reconstruction. Ann Otol, Rhinol, Laryngol. 2018;127(3):205–208.
    1. Conroy FJ, Mahaffey PJ. Intraoral flap depilation using the long‐pulsed alexandrite laser. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(11):e421–e423.
    1. Kaune KM, Haas E, Jantke M, Kramer FJ, Gruber R, Thoms KM, et al. Successful Nd:YAG laser therapy for hair removal in the oral cavity after plastic reconstruction using hairy donor sites. Dermatology. 2013;226(4):324–328.
    1. Scarano A, Lorusso F, Di Cerbo A, Lucchina AG, Carinci F. Eradication of hairy mouth after oncological resection of the tongue and floor mouth using a diode laser 808 nm. Postoperative pain assessment using thermal infrared imaging. Lasers Surg Med. 2019;51(6):516–521.
    1. Rodrigues BTG, Nunes LAS, Amaral LR, Siqueira DAV, Pêssoa TM, Ramos RT, et al. Successful hair removal on intraoral grafts using the diode laser: report of two cases. Spec Care Dentist. 2021;41(1):135–139.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources