Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Jun;26(6):1399-1407.
doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3234. Epub 2024 May 14.

Frailty according to the 2019 HFA-ESC definition in patients at risk for advanced heart failure: Insights from the HELP-HF registry

Affiliations
Free article
Multicenter Study

Frailty according to the 2019 HFA-ESC definition in patients at risk for advanced heart failure: Insights from the HELP-HF registry

Alessandro Villaschi et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Aims: Frailty is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), but a concordant definition of this condition is lacking. The Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (HFA-ESC) proposed in 2019 a new multi-domain definition of frailty, but it has never been validated.

Methods and results: Patients from the HELP-HF registry were stratified according to the number of HFA-ESC frailty domains fulfilled and to the cumulative deficits frailty index (FI) quintiles. Prevalence of frailty and of each domain was reported, as well as the rate of the composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalization, its single components, and cardiovascular death in each group and quintile. Among 854 included patients, 37 (4.3%), 206 (24.1%), 365 (42.8%), 217 (25.4%), and 29 (3.4%) patients fulfilled zero, one, two, three, or four domains, respectively, while 179 patients had a FI < 0.21 and were considered not frail. The 1-year risk of adverse events increased proportionally to the number of domains fulfilled (for each criterion increase, all-cause death or HF hospitalization: hazard ratio [HR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-1.62; all-cause death: HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.46-2.02, HF hospitalizations: subHR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.31; cardiovascular death: HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.45-2.15). Consistent results were found stratifying the cohort for FI quintiles. The FI as a continuous variable demonstrated higher discriminative ability than the number of domains fulfilled (area under the curve = 0.68 vs. 0.64, p = 0.004).

Conclusion: Frailty in patients at risk for advanced HF, assessed via a multi-domain approach and the FI, is highly prevalent and identifies those at increased risk of adverse events. The FI was found to be slightly more effective in identifying patients at increased risk of mortality.

Keywords: Advanced heart failure; Frailty; Frailty index; Heart failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Predicting survival in patients with severe heart failure: Risk score validation in the HELP-HF cohort.
    Chiarito M, Stolfo D, Villaschi A, Sartori S, Baldetti L, Lombardi CM, Adamo M, Loiacono F, Sammartino AM, Riccardi M, Tomasoni D, Inciardi RM, Maccallini M, Gasparini G, Grossi B, Contessi S, Cocianni D, Perotto M, Barone G, Merlo M, Cappelletti AM, Sinagra G, Pini D, Metra M, Pagnesi M. Chiarito M, et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Apr;27(4):726-736. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3585. Epub 2025 Jan 20. Eur J Heart Fail. 2025. PMID: 39834041 Free PMC article.
  • Assessment of frailty in patients with heart failure: A new Heart Failure Frailty Score developed by Delphi consensus.
    Vitale C, Berthelot E, Coats AJS, Loreena H, Albert NM, Tkaczyszyn M, Adamopoulos S, Anderson L, Anker MS, Anker SD, Bell D, Ben-Gal T, Bistola V, Bozkurt B, Brooks P, Camafort M, Carrero JJ, Chioncel O, Choi DJ, Chung WJ, Doehner W, Fernández-Bergés D, Ferrari R, Fiuzat M, Gomez-Mesa JE, Gustafsson F, Jankowska E, Kang SM, Kinugawa K, Khunti K, Hobbs FDR, Lee C, Lopatin Y, Maddocks M, Maltese G, Marques-Sule E, Matsue Y, Miró Ò, Moura B, Piepoli M, Ponikowski P, Pulignano G, Rakisheva A, Ray R, Sciacqua A, Seferovic P, Sentandreu-Mañó T, Sze S, Sinclair A, Strömberg A, Theou O, Tsutsui H, Uchmanowicz I, Vidan MT, Volterrani M, von Haehling S, Yoo B, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Metra M, Rosano GMC. Vitale C, et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;12(3):1818-1831. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15187. Epub 2025 Feb 4. ESC Heart Fail. 2025. PMID: 39904922 Free PMC article.
  • Prognostic impact of multi-domain approaches and the Tilburg frailty indicator in elderly patients with heart failure.
    Guo X, Wu M, Xiao H, Liu J, Zhu X, Jin S, Liu Y, Zhu Y, Lin X, Mu Y. Guo X, et al. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Jul 19;37(1):225. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03121-5. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025. PMID: 40682694 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Denfeld QE, Winters‐Stone K, Mudd JO, Gelow JM, Kurdi S, Lee CS. The prevalence of frailty in heart failure: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Cardiol 2017;236:283–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.153
    1. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 2005;173:489–495. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050051
    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:M146–M157. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146
    1. Vitale C, Jankowska E, Hill L, Piepoli M, Doehner W, Anker SD, et al. Heart Failure Association/European Society of Cardiology position paper on frailty in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2019;21:1299–1305. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1611
    1. Gorodeski EZ, Goyal P, Hummel SL, Krishnaswami A, Goodlin SJ, Hart LL, et al.; Geriatric Cardiology Section Leadership Council, American College of Cardiology. Domain management approach to heart failure in the geriatric patient: Present and future. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:1921–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.059

Publication types