Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 May 1:2024.04.29.24306516.
doi: 10.1101/2024.04.29.24306516.

Impact of year-long cannabis use for medical symptoms on brain activation during cognitive processes

Affiliations

Impact of year-long cannabis use for medical symptoms on brain activation during cognitive processes

Debbie Burdinski et al. medRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Importance: Cannabis is increasingly being used to treat medical symptoms, but the effects of cannabis use on brain function in those using cannabis for these symptoms is not known.

Objective: To test whether brain activation during working memory, reward, and inhibitory control tasks, areas of cognition impacted by cannabis, showed increases following one year of cannabis use for medical symptoms.

Design: This observational cohort study took place from July 2017 to July 2020 and is reported on in 2024.

Setting: Participants were from the greater Boston area.

Participants: Participants were recruited as part of a clinical trial based on seeking medical cannabis cards for anxiety, depression, pain, or sleep disorders, and were between 18 and 65 years. Exclusion criteria were daily cannabis use and cannabis use disorder at baseline.

Main outcomes and measures: Outcomes were whole brain functional activation during tasks involving working memory, reward and inhibitory control at baseline and after one year of cannabis use.

Results: Imaging was collected in participants before and one year after obtaining medical cannabis cards; 57 at baseline (38 female [66.7%]; mean [SD] age, 38.0 [14.6] years) at baseline, and 54 at one-year (37 female [68.5%]; mean [SD] age, 38.7 [14.3] years). Imaging was also collected in 32 healthy control participants (22 female [68.8%]; mean [SD] age, 33.8 [11.8] years) at baseline. In all groups and at both time points, functional imaging revealed canonical activations of the probed cognitive processes. No statistically significant difference in brain activation between the two timepoints (baseline and one-year) in those with medical cannabis cards and no association of changes in cannabis use frequency with brain activation were found.

Conclusions and relevance: Findings suggest that adults do not show significant neural effects in the areas of cognition of working memory, reward, and inhibitory control after one year of cannabis use for medical symptoms. The results warrant further studies that probe effects of cannabis at higher doses, with greater frequency, in younger age groups, and with larger, more diverse cohorts.

Trial registration: NCT03224468, https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: AEE has served as a consultant to Charles River Analytics (NIDA SBIR grant) and Karuna Pharmaceuticals (Chair Data Monitoring Board). Other investigators report no potential conflicts.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Brain activation for the N-back task’s two-back vs. zero-back contrast across groups and timepoints
The HC group at baseline (n=22), the MCC group at baseline (n=40), and the MCC group at one-year (n=40) did not show activation differences between the two groups at baseline or between the two time points of the MCC group. Cannabis use frequency changes were not associated with brain activation at one-year. Figure 1a: Voxel-wise average brain activation, colored by effect size and opacity-scaled by z-scores with significance threshold (FDR=0.05) outlined, for the two-back vs. zero-back contrast of the N-back task. z-thresholds: HC group at baseline=3.05; MCC group at baseline=2.47, and MCC at one-year=2.60. Colorbar displays effect size. Figure 1b: Grayordinate-wise average brain activation z-scores above significance threshold (FDR=0.05) for the two-back vs. zero-back contrast of the N-back task. z-thresholds: HC group at baseline=2.60), MCC group at baseline=2.21, and MCC at one-year=2.35. Colorbar displays z-scores. HC=healthy control; MCC=medical cannabis card.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Brain activation for various contrasts of the MID task across groups and timepoints
The HC group at baseline (n=23), the MCC group at baseline (n=35), and the MCC group at one-year (n=40; except High Loss vs. Neutral Hit: n=39) did not show activation differences between the two groups at baseline or between the two time points of the MCC group. Cannabis use frequency changes were not associated with brain activation at one-year. Figure 2a: Voxel-wise average brain activation, colored by effect size and opacity-scaled by z-scores with significance threshold (FDR=0.05) outlined, for the high reward cue vs. baseline contrast (top row) and the high loss vs. neutral hit feedback contrast (bottom row) of the MID task. z-thresholds: HC group at baseline=3.37 (top) and undetermined (bottom), MCC group at baseline=3.24 (top) and 4.34 (bottom), and MCC at one-year=3.10 (top) and 4.65 (bottom). Note that activation for the other contrasts was below threshold. Colorbar displays effect size. Undetermined z-threshold indicates that no voxel was statistically significant. Figure 2b: Grayordinate-wise average brain activation z-scores above significance threshold (FDR=0.05) for the high reward cue vs. baseline contrast of the MID task. z-thresholds: HC group at baseline=2.91, MCC group at baseline=2.74, and MCC at one-year=2.70. Note that activation for the other contrasts was below threshold. Colorbar displays z-scores. HC=healthy control; MCC=medical cannabis card.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Brain activation for the SST task’s two STOP vs. GO contrasts across groups and timepoints
The HC group at baseline (n=25), the MCC group at baseline (n=40), and the MCC group at one-year (n=44) did not show activation differences between the two groups at baseline or between the two time points of the MCC group. Cannabis use frequency changes were not associated with brain activation at one-year. Figure 3a: Voxel-wise average brain activation, colored by effect size and opacity-scaled by z-scores with significance threshold (FDR=0.05) outlined, for the successful STOP vs. GO contrast (top row) and the unsuccessful STOP vs. GO contrast (bottom row) for the SST task. z-thresholds: HC group at baseline=2.77 (top) and 2.87 (bottom); MCC group at baseline=2.56 (top) and 2.62 (bottom), and MCC at one-year=2.62 (top) and 2.55 (bottom). Colorbar displays effect size. Figure 3b: Grayordinate-wise average brain activation z-scores above significance threshold (FDR=0.05) for the successful STOP vs. GO contrast (top row) and the unsuccessful STOP vs. GO contrast (bottom row) for the SST task. z-thresholds: HC group at baseline=2.25 (top) and 2.31 (bottom); MCC group at baseline=2.15 (top) and 2.20 (bottom), and MCC at one-year=2.22 (top) and 2.13 (bottom). Colorbar displays z-scores. HC=healthy control; MCC=medical cannabis card.

References

    1. Burggren AC, Shirazi A, Ginder N, London ED. Cannabis effects on brain structure, function, and cognition: considerations for medical uses of cannabis and its derivatives. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(6):563–579. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Batalla A, Bhattacharyya S, Yücel M, et al. Structural and functional imaging studies in chronic cannabis users: a systematic review of adolescent and adult findings. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55821. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yanes JA, Riedel MC, Ray KL, et al. Neuroimaging meta-analysis of cannabis use studies reveals convergent functional alterations in brain regions supporting cognitive control and reward processing. J Psychopharmacol. 2018;32(3):283–295. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mason NL, Theunissen EL, Hutten NRPW, et al. Reduced responsiveness of the reward system is associated with tolerance to cannabis impairment in chronic users. Addict Biol. 2021;26(1):e12870. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crane NA, Schuster RM, Fusar-Poli P, Gonzalez R. Effects of cannabis on neurocognitive functioning: recent advances, neurodevelopmental influences, and sex differences. Neuropsychol Rev. 2013;23(2):117–137. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data