Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 3;8(5):102151.
doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.102151. eCollection 2024 May.

Assessing the Cost of Nutritionally Adequate and Low-Climate Impact Diets in Finland

Xavier Irz  1   2 , Laura Sares-Jäske  3 , Heli Tapanainen  3 , Jyrki Niemi  2 , Laura Paalanen  3 , Merja Saarinen  4 , Liisa M Valsta  3
Affiliations

Assessing the Cost of Nutritionally Adequate and Low-Climate Impact Diets in Finland

Xavier Irz et al. Curr Dev Nutr. .

Abstract

Background: Dietary changes form an important component of the sustainability transition of food systems but could be hindered by the cost of sustainable diets.

Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the cost of nutritionally adequate and culturally acceptable diets with low-greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) in Finland.

Methods: Two optimization models were built to find diets complying with nutritional and emissions requirements. The first model minimizes diet cost and the second one deviation from current diets. Both are calibrated to Finnish sociodemographic groups using dietary intake data, household budget survey data (for prices), and life cycle assessment coefficients (for GHGE). Three scenarios are simulated: "Health only" imposes only compliance with nutritional constraints, whereas "Health and GHGE-33%" and "Health and GHGE-50%" impose, in addition, minimum reductions in GHGE.

Results: Minimum cost diets have a low-carbon footprint [-65% (-73%) for females (males)] and low cost [-69% (-73%) for females (males)] when compared with current diets but lack diversity and cultural acceptability. The more culturally acceptable health-only minimum deviation diets are marginally less costly and have a lower climate impact than baseline diets across all population groups. Reducing GHGE results in a substantial decrease in the cost of the minimum deviation diets. The lower cost of the minimum deviation diets with reduced GHGE results from both intercategory and intracategory substitutions.

Conclusions: Affordability is not the key obstacle to the adoption of nutritionally adequate and lower GHGE diets, but cultural acceptability is. Reducing the climate footprint of diets can generate side benefits in terms of nutrition and affordability, which confirms that dietary change should be central to the sustainability transition of the Finnish food system. However, more attention should be paid to the issues of taste, convenience, social norms, and other aspects determining the cultural acceptability of sustainable diets.

Keywords: climate change; cost; diet; environmental impact; food consumption; just transition; optimization; sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Cost, energy, and GHGE for the baseline and simulated minimum deviation diets: average adult female. The main food categories are defined in Table 2. GHGE, greenhouse gas emission.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Cost, energy, and GHGE for the baseline and simulated minimum deviation diets: average adult male. The main food categories are defined in Table 2. GHGE, greenhouse gas emission.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Diet cost (€/cap/d) across sociodemographic groups: males. The main food categories are defined in Table 2.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Diet cost (€/cap/d) across sociodemographic groups: females. The main food categories are defined in Table 2.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Campbell B.M., Beare D.J., Bennett E.M., Hall-Spencer J.M., Ingram J.S., Jaramillo F. Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol. Soc. Soc. 2017;22(4):8.
    1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organisation . FAO; Rome, Italy: 2019. Sustainable healthy diets—guiding principles.
    1. von Braun J., Afsana K., Fresco L.O., Hassan M.H.A. Springer Nature; 2023. Science and innovations for food systems transformation; p. 948.https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/61280 [Internet] Available from: - PubMed
    1. Willett W., Rockström J., Loken B., Springmann M., Lang T., Vermeulen S., et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019;393:447–492. - PubMed
    1. European Commission . 2020. Towards a sustainable food system, EC, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Brussels, Belgium.

LinkOut - more resources