Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14072.
doi: 10.1111/hex.14072.

PPIE in a technical research study: Using public involvement to refine the concept and understanding and move towards a multidimensional concept of disability

William Lammons  1   2 , Lucky Nobility  1 , Sarah Markham  1   3 , Eirini-Christina Saloniki  1   2
Affiliations

PPIE in a technical research study: Using public involvement to refine the concept and understanding and move towards a multidimensional concept of disability

William Lammons et al. Health Expect. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Disability is often an essentialised and oversimplified concept. We propose refining this while incorporating the multidimensional nature of disability by increasing the use of existing survey questions and their corresponding data to enrich, broaden and inform understandings of disability.

Methods: We combined patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) with focus groups and concept mapping to collaboratively map disability survey questions into conceptual models of disability with six members of the public with lived experiences of disability.

Results: Using reflexive thematic analysis, we identified three qualitative themes and eight subthemes through a series of four PPIE activities: (1) understanding concepts of disability based on individual experience, subthemes: 1.1-preference for the biopsychosocial model, 1.2-'Reviewing' instead of mapping survey questions and 1.3-comparing questions to real life; (2) consistency between understanding needs and implementing adjustments, subthemes: 2.1-connecting preparation and operation, 2.2-inclusivity and adjustments in activities and 2.3-feedback for improving activities and (3) real-world applications-targeted awareness raising, subthemes: 3.1-who, where, what and how to share activity findings and results, 3.2-sharing with human resource and equality, diversity and inclusion professionals.

Conclusion: Members of the public who collaborated in these activities felt empowered, engaged and supported throughout this study. This approach offers a model for other researchers to cede power to the public over the research aspects typically reserved for researchers.

Patient or public contribution: We involved members of the public with lived experience throughout this study-co-design, co-facilitation, collaboratively mapping the disability or disability-related survey questions into conceptual models of disability, evaluation of the activities, co-analysis and co-authorship.

Keywords: disability; focus groups; mapping; public involvement; surveys.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Jones M, Saloniki EC. Exploring the relationship between impairment and disability in Great Britain: evidence from the life opportunities survey. J Disability Policy Stud. 2022;33(3):147‐157. 10.1177/10442073211021532 - DOI
    1. Altman BM, Gulley SP. Convergence and divergence: differences in disability prevalence estimates in the United States and Canada based on four health survey instruments. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(4):543‐552. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDermott S, Turk MA. The myth and reality of disability prevalence: measuring disability for research and service. Disabil Health J. 2011;4(1):1‐5. 10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.06.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. White C. An update to measuring chronic illness, impairment and disability in national data sources. Health Stat Q. 2009;(42):40‐53. 10.1057/hsq.2009.16 - DOI - PubMed
    1. UK Standards for Public Involvement . UK Public Involvement Standards Development Partnership. NIHR; 2019.

Publication types