Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;50(6):832-848.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07377-9. Epub 2024 May 15.

Interventions for improving critical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Duncan Wagstaff  1 , Sumaiya Arfin  2 , Alba Korver  3 , Patrick Chappel  1 , Aasiyah Rashan  1 , Rashan Haniffa  4   5 , Abi Beane  4   5
Affiliations

Interventions for improving critical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Duncan Wagstaff et al. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jun.

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically review the typology, impact, quality of evidence, barriers, and facilitators to implementation of Quality Improvement (QI) interventions for adult critical care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on 1st September 2022. The studies were included if they described the implementation of QI interventions for adult critical care in LMICs, available as full text, in English and published after 2000. The risks of bias were assessed using the ROB 2.0/ROBINS-I tools. Intervention strategies were categorised according to a Knowledge Translation framework. Interventions' effectiveness were synthesised by vote counting and assessed with a binomial test. Barriers and facilitators to implementation were narratively synthesised using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results: 78 studies were included. Risk of bias was high. The most common intervention strategies were Education, Audit & Feedback (A&F) and Protocols/Guidelines/Bundles/Checklists (PGBC). Two multifaceted strategies improved both process and outcome measures: Education and A&F (p = 0.008); and PGBC with Education and A&F (p = 0.001, p < 0.001). Facilitators to implementation were stakeholder engagement, organisational readiness for implementation, and adaptability of interventions. Barriers were lack of resources and incompatibility with clinical workflows.

Conclusions: The evidence for QI in critical care in LMICs is sparse and at high risk of bias but suggests that multifaceted interventions are most effective. Co-designing interventions with and engaging stakeholders, communicating relative advantages, employing local champions and adapting to feedback can improve implementation. Hybrid study designs, process evaluations and adherence to reporting guidelines would improve the evidence base.

Keywords: Critical care; Implementation science; Intensive Care; LMICs; Quality improvement; Service improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. McPheeters ML, Kripalani S, Peterson NB, Idowu RT, Jerome RN, Potter SA, Andrews JC, (2012) Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 3: quality improvement interventions to address health disparities). Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep): 1–475. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK107315/
    1. Jones B, Kwong E, Warburton W (2021) Quality improvement made simple: What everyone should know about Healthcare quality improvement: Quick guide. Health Foundation, https://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/upload/publications/2021/Q... . Accessed April 2021
    1. Coles E, Anderson J, Maxwell M, Harris FM, Gray NM, Milner G, MacGillivray S (2020) The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review. Syst Rev 9:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01344-3 - DOI
    1. Baelani I, Jochberger S, Laimer T, Otieno D, Kabutu J, Wilson I, Baker T, Dünser MW (2011) Availability of critical care resources to treat patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in Africa: a self-reported, continent-wide survey of anaesthesia providers. Crit Care 15:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9410 - DOI
    1. Losonczy LI, Papali A, Kivlehan S, Hynes EJC, Calderon G, Laytin A, Moll V, Al Hazmi A, Alsabri M, Aryal D (2021) White paper on early critical care services in low resource settings. Ann Glob Health. https://doi.org/10.5334/2Faogh.3377 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources