Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985 Jan-Mar;70(1):23-7.

Stapling devices in gastrointestinal surgery

  • PMID: 3874849

Stapling devices in gastrointestinal surgery

A Tuchmann et al. Int Surg. 1985 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

In a series of 189 patients, 197 operations (251 stapled anastomoses) were performed. U.S. Surgical Corporation instruments (GIA n = 156, EEA n = 36, TA n = 59) were used in surgery of the stomach, pancreas, small and large bowel, and the rates of complications were investigated. The EEA gave 14% complications because of the frequent failure (33%) of the anastomosis after low anterior resection. The reasons for failure were incomplete rings, colonic wall damage and too short rectal stumps. The use of the EEA in esophago-jejunostomy and esophago-gastrostomy was safe and the postoperative course uneventful. The GIA was used in intestinal and colonic surgery and was pleasant and quick to use (right hemicolectomy: 1 hour 40 minutes; sigmoid resection: 1 hour 45 minutes). Complications occurred in the intestine (6%) and colon (7%). Only with GIA stapled anastomoses was there a risk of hemorrhage (2.5%). The incidence of anastomotic leakage (all staplers) was 3.6%; the stapler was responsible for a 2.0% mortality. Weighing up the indications and contraindications of stapling devices, this method presents an advantageous but not indispensable method in gastrointestinal surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer