Assessment of the 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria in a Chinese cohort: Impact on clinical practice

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in a Chinese cohort, and compare them with the Sapporo and revised Sapporo criteria.

Methods: A cohort comprising 436 patients diagnosed with APS and 514 control subjects was enrolled, including 83 with seronegative APS and 86 classified as antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) carriers. We assessed IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies using ELISA, along with a systematic collection of lupus anticoagulant data. Subsequently, we compared the sensitivity and specificity across the three classification criteria.

Results: The 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria exhibited improved specificity at 98 %, surpassing the revised Sapporo (90 %) and original Sapporo (91 %) criteria. However, this came with decreased sensitivity at 82 %, in contrast to higher sensitivities in the revised Sapporo (98 %) and Sapporo (91 %) criteria. Examining individual components sheds light on the scoring system's rationale within the new criteria. The inclusion of microvascular thrombosis, cardiac valve disease, and thrombocytopenia improved the identification of nine patients previously classified as "probable APS". Insufficient scoring in 78 previously diagnosed APS individuals was linked to traditional risk factor evaluations for thrombotic events, the emphasis on determining whether obstetric events are linked to severe preeclampsia (PEC) or placental insufficiency (PI), and the lower scores assigned to IgM aCL and/or aβ2GPI antibody. Seronegative APS remained a challenge, as non-criteria aPL and other methods were not included.

Conclusions: The new criteria presented notable advancements in specificity. This study provides detailed insights into the strengths and possible challenges of the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria, enhancing our understanding of their impact on clinical practice.

Keywords: Antiphospholipid antibody; Antiphospholipid syndrome; Classification criteria; Seronegative APS; aPL carrier.