Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug;7(1):345-368.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-110723-024625. Epub 2024 Jul 24.

Graph Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Affiliations
Review

Graph Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Ruth Johnson et al. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

In clinical artificial intelligence (AI), graph representation learning, mainly through graph neural networks and graph transformer architectures, stands out for its capability to capture intricate relationships and structures within clinical datasets. With diverse data-from patient records to imaging-graph AI models process data holistically by viewing modalities and entities within them as nodes interconnected by their relationships. Graph AI facilitates model transfer across clinical tasks, enabling models to generalize across patient populations without additional parameters and with minimal to no retraining. However, the importance of human-centered design and model interpretability in clinical decision-making cannot be overstated. Since graph AI models capture information through localized neural transformations defined on relational datasets, they offer both an opportunity and a challenge in elucidating model rationale. Knowledge graphs can enhance interpretability by aligning model-driven insights with medical knowledge. Emerging graph AI models integrate diverse data modalities through pretraining, facilitate interactive feedback loops, and foster human-AI collaboration, paving the way toward clinically meaningful predictions.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; graph neural networks; graph transformers; health care; human-centered AI; knowledge graphs; medicine; multimodal learning; transfer learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Variants of neural networks for graphs, including temporal graphs, hypergraphs, and subgraphs. a) shows a message-passing scheme by which messages are propagated along edges for each node. b) shows an example of a graph transformer, where the graph is expanded into a sequence with positional encodings. c) shows temporal graphs sampled over times t,t+1; these methods often use variants of a) or b) to learn representations at each step. d) shows a hypergraph, where hyperedges (rounded shapes) can encompass more than two nodes. e) shows a subgraph neural network, which learns representations for Si, Sj even when these subgraphs are disconnected.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Strategies for incorporating inductive biases and enabling transfer learning on knowledge graphs, including a) biologically informed neural network architectures, b) supplementing patient data with biomedical ontologies, and c) fine-tuning large pre-trained models across a broad range of clinical tasks.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Deep learning on a) multimodal clinical datasets including omics-data, medical imaging, EHR, and more. Data modalities can be fused through b) early, c) intermediate, and d) late integration strategies. Elements of this figure were created using BioRender.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Mathematical and user-centered explainability for clinical AI tools affect various stakeholders across data scientists, researchers, clinicians, patients, and administrators.

References

    1. Council N. 2011. Committee on a framework for developing a new taxonomy of disease. toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease - PubMed
    1. Collins FS, Varmus H. 2015. A new initiative on precision medicine. New England journal of medicine 372(9)793–795 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Safran C, Bloomrosen M, Hammond WE, Labkoff S, Markel-Fox S, et al. 2007. Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an american medical informatics association white paper. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(1):1–9 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Data MC, Nair S, Hsu D, Celi LA. 2016. Challenges and opportunities in secondary analyses of electronic health record data. Secondary analysis of electronic health records :17–26 - PubMed
    1. Sandhu E, Weinstein S, McKethan A, Jain SH. 2012. Secondary uses of electronic health record data: benefits and barriers. Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety 38(1):34–40 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources